Success Story of India-Bangladesh Power System Operation

Author(s):  
Saif Rehman ◽  
Rahul Shukla ◽  
Aman Gautam ◽  
Arifur Kabir ◽  
Sharif Shamsul Alam ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
S R Narasimhan ◽  
S S Barpanda ◽  
Debasis De ◽  
N Nallarasan ◽  
G Chakraborty ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 131 (8) ◽  
pp. 670-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoto Yorino ◽  
Yutaka Sasaki ◽  
Shoki Fujita ◽  
Yoshifumi Zoka ◽  
Yoshiharu Okumoto

Author(s):  
Andrés Honrubia‐Escribano ◽  
Raquel Villena‐Ruiz ◽  
Estefanía Artigao ◽  
Emilio Gómez‐Lázaro ◽  
Ana Morales

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Friederike Wenderoth ◽  
Elisabeth Drayer ◽  
Robert Schmoll ◽  
Michael Niedermeier ◽  
Martin Braun

Abstract Historically, the power distribution grid was a passive system with limited control capabilities. Due to its increasing digitalization, this paradigm has shifted: the passive architecture of the power system itself, which includes cables, lines, and transformers, is extended by a communication infrastructure to become an active distribution grid. This transformation to an active system results from control capabilities that combine the communication and the physical components of the grid. It aims at optimizing, securing, enhancing, or facilitating the power system operation. The combination of power system, communication, and control capabilities is also referred to as a “smart grid”. A multitude of different architectures exist to realize such integrated systems. They are often labeled with descriptive terms such as “distributed,” “decentralized,” “local,” or “central." However, the actual meaning of these terms varies considerably within the research community.This paper illustrates the conflicting uses of prominent classification terms for the description of smart grid architectures. One source of this inconsistency is that the development of such interconnected systems is not only in the hands of classic power engineering but requires input from neighboring research disciplines such as control theory and automation, information and telecommunication technology, and electronics. This impedes a clear classification of smart grid solutions. Furthermore, this paper proposes a set of well-defined operation architectures specialized for use in power systems. Based on these architectures, this paper defines clear classifiers for the assessment of smart grid solutions. This allows the structural classification and comparison between different smart grid solutions and promotes a mutual understanding between the research disciplines. This paper presents revised parts of Chapters 4.2 and 5.2 of the dissertation of Drayer (Resilient Operation of Distribution Grids with Distributed-Hierarchical Architecture. Energy Management and Power System Operation, vol. 6, 2018).


2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (8) ◽  
pp. 541-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Belyaev ◽  
N. V. Korovkin ◽  
O. V. Frolov ◽  
V. S. Chudnyi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document