The prison construction decision analysis for reducing capacity overloads with the social cost of crime concept

Author(s):  
Hsiao-Ling Chang ◽  
Tyrone T. Lin
1988 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 565-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.B. Lave ◽  
G.S. Omenn

A decision analysis framework is used to explore the value of screening tests for carcinogenicity. Whether a test lowers the social cost of screening depends on the test's sensitivity, specificity, and cost and the social cost of misclassification (exonerating carcinogenic chemicals or condemning noncarcinogenic chemicals). The model shows that the best screening test need not be either the most accurate or the least expensive.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross P. Crothers ◽  
Jacqueline M. Diggs ◽  
Darwin A. Guevarra ◽  
Jia Wei Zhang ◽  
Ryan T. Howell
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
SÉBASTIEN RIOUX
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Gianfranco Pacchioni

This chapter explores how validation of new results works in science. It also looks at the peer-review process, both pros and cons, as well as scientific communication, scientific journals, and scientific publishers. We give an assessment of the total number of existing journals with peer review. Other topics discussed include the phenomenon of open access, predatory journals and their impact on contemporary science, and the market of scientific publications. Finally, we touch on degenerative phenomena, such as the market of co-authors, bogus papers, and irrelevant and wrong studies, as well as the problem and the social cost of irreproducible results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document