Abstract
The present study examines the efficiency of discrete and continuous approaches to measuring urban heterogeneity effects on land surface temperature (LST). In the discrete approach, landscape metrics have been widely applied to quantifying the relationship between land surface temperature and urban spatial patterns and have received acceptable verification from landscape ecologists but some studies have shown their inaccurate results. The objective of the study is to compare landscape metrics and alternative approaches to measuring urban heterogeneity effects on LST. We compared landscape metrics results with nine texture-based measures, and two local spatial autocorrelation indices (local Moran’s I and Gi statistics) applied to NDVI and BAI indices as a proxy of the spatial patterns of Tehran vegetation and built-up classes. The statistical results showed that urban landscape heterogeneity had significant impacts on the LST variations, and there was a compatibility between landscape metrics and alternative measures results. Overall results showed that the less-fragmented, the more complex, larger, and the higher number of patches, the lower LST. The most significant relationship was between patch density (PD) and LST (r= -0.71). Higher values of PD have mostly been interpreted to show higher fragmentation, but other landscape metrics and alternative measures declined this conclusion. Our study demonstrated that PD was not a reliable metric and presented no information about the spatial distribution of landscape elements. This study confirms alternative measures for overcoming landscape metrics shortcomings in estimating the effects of landscape heterogeneity on LST variations and gives land managers and urban planners new insights into the urban design.
Quantifying how urban landscape heterogeneity affects land surface temperature: A comparison of discrete and continuous approaches
