Merge Event Bias in Project Evaluation Techniques – Problems and Directions

Author(s):  
Maksim Goman ◽  
Jelena Pecerska
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 6-13
Author(s):  
Kereboon Champathed ◽  
Chuvej Chansa-ngavej

Abstract: This paper aims to investigate the recent trend of the use of project evaluation techniques based on opinions of financial managers in Thai firms. The research uses a questionnaire built on a Sense and Respond (S&R) method called Critical Factors Index (CFI). It examines the trend using such CFI terms as importance, experiences, expectations, gaps, deviations and direction of development. The results show several critical areas for improvement needed including customer perspective and the traditional use of payback technique for project evaluation in the firm. The results also show that the needed improvement is more critical in small firms than in medium and large firms. The results further show that the improvement needed is more critical for merchandizing firms than for manufacturing and service firms.


1993 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald S. Remer ◽  
Scott B. Stokdyk ◽  
Mike Van Driel

1979 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-189
Author(s):  
A. R. Kemal

While the book under review provides a critical evaluation of cost-benefit analysis, it mainly focuses on the relevance and utility of project evaluation techniques for development planning. It has been argued in the book that no project can be meaningfully evaluated in isolation because its impact not only is confined to the project itself but tends to spill over to other projects as well. Such spill-over effects become all the more critical when the induced economic effects of that project are not marginal. In addition to the interdependence between projects, the author has drawn attention to an oft-neglected but very important aspect of cost-benefit analysis: Shadow prices are not very meaningful in the context of project evaluation exercise in the real world if they are computed without considering the structure of the economy, the pace of development and income distribution.


1975 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Nash ◽  
David Pearce ◽  
John Stanley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document