scholarly journals Bandwidth scheduling for big data transfer with two variable node-disjoint paths

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-144
Author(s):  
Aiqin Hou ◽  
Chase Qishi Wu ◽  
Liudong Zuo ◽  
Xiaoyang Zhang ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 47-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aiqin Hou ◽  
Chase Q. Wu ◽  
Dingyi Fang ◽  
Yongqiang Wang ◽  
Meng Wang

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aiqin Hou ◽  
Chase Q. Wu ◽  
Qiang Duan ◽  
Dawei Quan ◽  
Liudong Zuo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 2216
Author(s):  
Jiahui Jin ◽  
Qi An ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Jiakai Tang ◽  
Runqun Xiong

Network bandwidth is a scarce resource in big data environments, so data locality is a fundamental problem for data-parallel frameworks such as Hadoop and Spark. This problem is exacerbated in multicore server-based clusters, where multiple tasks running on the same server compete for the server’s network bandwidth. Existing approaches solve this problem by scheduling computational tasks near the input data and considering the server’s free time, data placements, and data transfer costs. However, such approaches usually set identical values for data transfer costs, even though a multicore server’s data transfer cost increases with the number of data-remote tasks. Eventually, this hampers data-processing time, by minimizing it ineffectively. As a solution, we propose DynDL (Dynamic Data Locality), a novel data-locality-aware task-scheduling model that handles dynamic data transfer costs for multicore servers. DynDL offers greater flexibility than existing approaches by using a set of non-decreasing functions to evaluate dynamic data transfer costs. We also propose online and offline algorithms (based on DynDL) that minimize data-processing time and adaptively adjust data locality. Although DynDL is NP-complete (nondeterministic polynomial-complete), we prove that the offline algorithm runs in quadratic time and generates optimal results for DynDL’s specific uses. Using a series of simulations and real-world executions, we show that our algorithms are 30% better than algorithms that do not consider dynamic data transfer costs in terms of data-processing time. Moreover, they can adaptively adjust data localities based on the server’s free time, data placement, and network bandwidth, and schedule tens of thousands of tasks within subseconds or seconds.


2019 ◽  
Vol E102.D (8) ◽  
pp. 1478-1488
Author(s):  
Eun-Sung JUNG ◽  
Si LIU ◽  
Rajkumar KETTIMUTHU ◽  
Sungwook CHUNG

Author(s):  
Brian Tierney ◽  
Ezra Kissel ◽  
Martin Swany ◽  
Eric Pouyoul

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document