GPU-Accelerated Method for Simulating Efficient Portfolios in the Mean-Variance Analysis

Author(s):  
Paradorn Charoenphaibul ◽  
Nopadon Juneam
1992 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sherris

AbstractThis paper considers a general framework for the selection of assets to meet the liabilities of a life insurance or pension fund. This general framework contains the mean-variance efficient portfolios of modern portfolio theory as a special case. The paper also demonstrates how the portfolio selection and matching approach of Wise (1984a, 1984b, 1987a, 1987b) and Wilkie (1985) fits into this general framework. The matching portfolio is derived as a special case, and is also shown to have implications for determining the central value of the liabilities.


Author(s):  
Kerry E. Back

The mean‐variance frontier is characterized with and without a risk‐free asset. The global minimum variance portfolio and tangency portfolio are defined, and two‐fund spanning is explained. The frontier is characterized in terms of the return defined from the SDF that is in the span of the assets. This is related to the Hansen‐Jagannathan bound. There is an SDF that is an affine function of a return if and only if the return is on the mean‐variance frontier. Separating distributions are defined and shown to imply two‐fund separation and mean‐variance efficiency of the market portfolio.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 550
Author(s):  
Barbara Alemanni ◽  
Mario Maggi ◽  
Pierpaolo Uberti

In asset management, the portfolio leverage affects performance, and can be subject to constraints and operational limitations. Due to the possible leverage aversion of the investors, the comparison between portfolio performances can be incomplete or misleading. We propose a procedure to unleverage the mean-variance efficient portfolios to satisfy a leverage requirement. We obtain a class of unleveraged portfolios that are homogeneous in terms of leverage, so therefore properly comparable. The proposed unleverage procedure permits isolating the pure allocation return, i.e., the return component, due to the qualitative choice of portfolio allocation, from the return component due to the portfolio leverage. Theoretical analysis and empirical evidence on actual data show that efficient mean-variance portfolios, once unleveraged, uncover mean-variance dominance relations hidden by the leverage contribution to portfolio return. Our approach may be useful to practitioners proposing to take long positions on “short assets” (e.g. inverse ETF), thereby considering short positions as active investment choices, in contrast with the usual interpretation where are used to overweight long positions.


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-47
Author(s):  
Byungwook Choi

This article explores the hedging effectiveness of KIKO options by using the mean-variance analysis of Markowitz and by comparing three hedge measures such as Sharpe hedging effectiveness measure proposed by Howard and D’Antonio (1987), Fishburn (1977)’s measure, and Ederington (1979)’s. which calculates the degree to which the rate of return per unit of risk increases and total volatilty and down-side risk of hedged portfolio diminishes respectively. This paper differs from the previous researches in that this research first assumes that the firms hold the same value of dollar amount as that of short calls at each of settlement dates, and secondly this article performs multiple period of analysis instead of single period. This paper finds first that the hedging effectiveness of KIKO options is not better than that of currency forward contract in making a reduction of the total volatility and down-side risks of hedged portfolio. Secondly the hedge effectiveness is the highest at the first settlement date but it plunges when the time passes by, which is mainly due to the fact that the value of in-the-money put decreases, but that of out-of-the-money call increases as the time to maturity increases. Thirdly, it is found that another KIKO option with the equal premium shows even better hedging performance than the original KIKO in three aspects of hedging effectiveness. In conclusion, the KIKO turns out to be a lemon.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 934-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeri Zakamouline ◽  
Steen Koekebakker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document