Forming Multi-agents Collaborative Communities in Overlapping Communities

Author(s):  
Yangyang Hu ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
Jian Lan ◽  
Junjie Zhang
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-197
Author(s):  
Juliet McMains

This paper interrogates the history of same-sex dancing among women in Buenos Aires' tango scene, focusing on its increasing visibility since 2005. Two overlapping communities of women are invoked. Queer tangueras are queer-identified female tango dancers and their allies who dance tango in a way that attempts to de-link tango's two roles from gender. Rebellious wallflowers are women who practice, teach, perform, and dance with other women in predominantly straight environments. It is argued that the growing acceptance of same-sex dancing in Argentina is due to the confluence of four developments: 1) the rise of tango commerce, 2) innovations of tango nuevo, 3) changing laws and social norms around lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights, and 4) synergy between queer tango dancers and heterosexual women who are frustrated by the limits of tango's gender matrix. The author advocates for increased alliances between rebellious wallflowers and queer tangueras, who are often segregated from each other in Buenos Aires' commercial tango industry.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 71-96
Author(s):  
Nicolas Cointe ◽  
Grégory Bonnet ◽  
Olivier Boissier
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 653-680
Author(s):  
Flavien Balbo ◽  
Olivier Boissier ◽  
Fabien Bladeg
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Anthea Roberts

Although we often hear reference to the “invisible college” of international lawyers, it may be better to understand international lawyers as constituting a “divisible college” whose members hail from different states and regions and often form distinct, though sometimes overlapping, communities with their own understandings and approaches, as well as their own influences and spheres of influence. This chapter draws on two recent high-profile controversies—Crimea’s annexation by, or reunification with, Russia in 2014, and the legality and legitimacy of the award in the South China Sea arbitration in 2016—to explore how the divisible college of international lawyers operates with respect to Chinese, Russian, and Western international lawyers. It looks at the extent to which international lawyers in these case studies operated in their own silos or made an effort to communicate across national and geopolitical divides.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document