Improving calibration precision of signal-delay-based time measurement systems in FPGAs

Author(s):  
Matthias Hinkfoth ◽  
Ralf Joost ◽  
Ralf Salomon
2013 ◽  
Vol 816-817 ◽  
pp. 1063-1068
Author(s):  
Rou Gang Zhou ◽  
Yun Fei Zhou ◽  
Guang Dou Liu ◽  
Xiao Tu

Currently the time to digital converter (TDC) integrated in FPGA performs time-to-digital conversion in the carry chain mode and inter-slot offset is caused to be severe by internal wiring in the FPGA. Based on the carry chain interpolation method, this paper proposes the method for using a delay module in FPGA to achieve accurate signal delay. By calculating the phase difference of multi-clock signal between two latch sampling points, the interval between two sampling points was obtained. Experimental results indicate a measurement accuracy of 78ps or 52ps can be reached by precisely collecting time through the delay module in FPGA. Compared to the carry chain interpolation method, this method is significantly advantageous in small inter-slot offset, stable performance and convenient design and can meet the requirement for time measurement or requirement by laser interferometer with a nm-level accuracy in nuclear physics.


2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venkatesh Iyengar ◽  
Ibrahim Elmadfa

The food safety security (FSS) concept is perceived as an early warning system for minimizing food safety (FS) breaches, and it functions in conjunction with existing FS measures. Essentially, the function of FS and FSS measures can be visualized in two parts: (i) the FS preventive measures as actions taken at the stem level, and (ii) the FSS interventions as actions taken at the root level, to enhance the impact of the implemented safety steps. In practice, along with FS, FSS also draws its support from (i) legislative directives and regulatory measures for enforcing verifiable, timely, and effective compliance; (ii) measurement systems in place for sustained quality assurance; and (iii) shared responsibility to ensure cohesion among all the stakeholders namely, policy makers, regulators, food producers, processors and distributors, and consumers. However, the functional framework of FSS differs from that of FS by way of: (i) retooling the vulnerable segments of the preventive features of existing FS measures; (ii) fine-tuning response systems to efficiently preempt the FS breaches; (iii) building a long-term nutrient and toxicant surveillance network based on validated measurement systems functioning in real time; (iv) focusing on crisp, clear, and correct communication that resonates among all the stakeholders; and (v) developing inter-disciplinary human resources to meet ever-increasing FS challenges. Important determinants of FSS include: (i) strengthening international dialogue for refining regulatory reforms and addressing emerging risks; (ii) developing innovative and strategic action points for intervention {in addition to Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) procedures]; and (iii) introducing additional science-based tools such as metrology-based measurement systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document