A Cascade of 2.5D CNN and Bidirectional CLSTM Network for Mitotic Cell Detection in 4D Microscopy Image

Author(s):  
Titinunt Kitrungrotsakul ◽  
Xian-Hau Han ◽  
Yutaro Iwamoto ◽  
Satoko Takemoto ◽  
Hideo Yokota ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuyong Xing ◽  
Yuanpu Xie ◽  
Xiaoshuang Shi ◽  
Pingjun Chen ◽  
Zizhao Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Nucleus or cell detection is a fundamental task in microscopy image analysis and supports many other quantitative studies such as object counting, segmentation, tracking, etc. Deep neural networks are emerging as a powerful tool for biomedical image computing; in particular, convolutional neural networks have been widely applied to nucleus/cell detection in microscopy images. However, almost all models are tailored for specific datasets and their applicability to other microscopy image data remains unknown. Some existing studies casually learn and evaluate deep neural networks on multiple microscopy datasets, but there are still several critical, open questions to be addressed. Results We analyze the applicability of deep models specifically for nucleus detection across a wide variety of microscopy image data. More specifically, we present a fully convolutional network-based regression model and extensively evaluate it on large-scale digital pathology and microscopy image datasets, which consist of 23 organs (or cancer diseases) and come from multiple institutions. We demonstrate that for a specific target dataset, training with images from the same types of organs might be usually necessary for nucleus detection. Although the images can be visually similar due to the same staining technique and imaging protocol, deep models learned with images from different organs might not deliver desirable results and would require model fine-tuning to be on a par with those trained with target data. We also observe that training with a mixture of target and other/non-target data does not always mean a higher accuracy of nucleus detection, and it might require proper data manipulation during model training to achieve good performance. Conclusions We conduct a systematic case study on deep models for nucleus detection in a wide variety of microscopy images, aiming to address several important but previously understudied questions. We present and extensively evaluate an end-to-end, pixel-to-pixel fully convolutional regression network and report a few significant findings, some of which might have not been reported in previous studies. The model performance analysis and observations would be helpful to nucleus detection in microscopy images.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1372 ◽  
pp. 012026
Author(s):  
Tan Xiao Jian ◽  
Mustafa Nazahah ◽  
Mashor Mohd Yusoff ◽  
Ab Rahman Khairul Shakir
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahir Mahmood ◽  
Muhammad Arsalan ◽  
Muhammad Owais ◽  
Min Beom Lee ◽  
Kang Ryoung Park

Breast cancer is the leading cause of mortality in women. Early diagnosis of breast cancer can reduce the mortality rate. In the diagnosis, the mitotic cell count is an important biomarker for predicting the aggressiveness, prognosis, and grade of breast cancer. In general, pathologists manually examine histopathology images under high-resolution microscopes for the detection of mitotic cells. However, because of the minute differences between the mitotic and normal cells, this process is tiresome, time-consuming, and subjective. To overcome these challenges, artificial-intelligence-based (AI-based) techniques have been developed which automatically detect mitotic cells in the histopathology images. Such AI techniques accelerate the diagnosis and can be used as a second-opinion system for a medical doctor. Previously, conventional image-processing techniques were used for the detection of mitotic cells, which have low accuracy and high computational cost. Therefore, a number of deep-learning techniques that demonstrate outstanding performance and low computational cost were recently developed; however, they still require improvement in terms of accuracy and reliability. Therefore, we present a multistage mitotic-cell-detection method based on Faster region convolutional neural network (Faster R-CNN) and deep CNNs. Two open datasets (international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR) 2012 and ICPR 2014 (MITOS-ATYPIA-14)) of breast cancer histopathology were used in our experiments. The experimental results showed that our method achieves the state-of-the-art results of 0.876 precision, 0.841 recall, and 0.858 F1-measure for the ICPR 2012 dataset, and 0.848 precision, 0.583 recall, and 0.691 F1-measure for the ICPR 2014 dataset, which were higher than those obtained using previous methods. Moreover, we tested the generalization capability of our technique by testing on the tumor proliferation assessment challenge 2016 (TUPAC16) dataset and found that our technique also performs well in a cross-dataset experiment which proved the generalization capability of our proposed technique.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anan Liu ◽  
Tong Hao ◽  
Zan Gao ◽  
Yuting Su ◽  
Zhaoxuan Yang

This paper proposes a nonnegative mix-norm convex optimization method for mitotic cell detection. First, we apply an imaging model-based microscopy image segmentation method that exploits phase contrast optics to extract mitotic candidates in the input images. Then, a convex objective function regularized by mix-norm with nonnegative constraint is proposed to induce sparsity and consistence for discriminative representation of deformable objects in a sparse representation scheme. At last, a Support Vector Machine classifier is utilized for mitotic cell modeling and detection. This method can overcome the difficulty in feature formulation for deformable objects and is independent of tracking or temporal inference model. The comparison experiments demonstrate that the proposed method can produce competing results with the state-of-the-art methods.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 5669-5679
Author(s):  
Titinunt Kitrungrotsakul ◽  
Xian-Hua Han ◽  
Yutaro Iwamoto ◽  
Satoko Takemoto ◽  
Hideo Yokota ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document