Finite-Element Analysis of Temperature Increase in Vascularized Biological Tissues Exposed to RF Sources

2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 1682-1685 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. De Santis ◽  
M. Feliziani ◽  
F. Maradei ◽  
C. Buccella
Author(s):  
Victor Caraveo ◽  
Scott Lovald ◽  
Tariq Khraishi ◽  
Jon Wagner ◽  
Brett Baack

FE modeling of biological tissues and physiological behavior is now becoming common practice with the improvement in finite element analysis (FEA) software and the significant increase in capability of computing resources. There are many uses for FEA of this nature, one of which has been simulating the mechanical behavior of implant devices for fracture repair. FE analysis offers insight into the mechanistic behavior of fixation plates used in rigid internal fixation and, if modeled carefully, could eventually become an accurate design tool.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-201
Author(s):  
Mustafa Gungormus ◽  
Guzin Neda Hasanoglu Erbasar

Removal of osseointegrated but otherwise failed (mechanical failure, mispositioning, esthetics, etc) dental implants is a traumatic process resulting in loss of healthy bone and complicating the treatment process. The traumatic effects of implant removal can be reduced by weakening the implant-bone attachment. Thermal necrosis-aided implant removal has been proposed as a minimally invasive method toward this end. In this method, an electrocautery tip is contacted to the implant to increase the temperature to 47°C and generate a limited and controlled thermal necrosis at the bone-implant interface. So far, no controlled studies have been performed to investigate the optimal clinical parameters for this method. In this study, we aimed to investigate, using finite element analysis method, the optimal settings to achieve intentional thermal necrosis on 3 implant systems, at 5 W and 40 W device power and with different size tips. The temperature increase of the implants at 40 W power was very sudden (< 0.5 seconds) and as the bone reached 47°C, the implants were at unacceptable temperatures. At 5 W power, temperature increase of the implants happened at manageable durations (< 1 second). Moreover, the temperature increase was even slower with larger implants and larger tip sizes. Therefore, low power settings must be used for thermal necrosis-aided implant removal. Also, the size of the implant and the tip must be taken into consideration in deciding the duration of contact with the electrocautery tip and the implant.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1780-1788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian A. Stokes ◽  
Salman Chegini ◽  
Stephen J. Ferguson ◽  
Mack G. Gardner-Morse ◽  
James C. Iatridis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document