New Approach in Design Education for Additive Manufacturing using RC Race Car Models

Author(s):  
Stefan Junk
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 939-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace X. Gu ◽  
Chun-Teh Chen ◽  
Deon J. Richmond ◽  
Markus J. Buehler

A new approach to design hierarchical materials using convolutional neural networks is proposed and validated through additive manufacturing and testing.


Author(s):  
Alain Bernard ◽  
Mary Kathryn Thompson ◽  
Giovanni Moroni ◽  
Tom Vaneker ◽  
Eujin Pei ◽  
...  

Design Issues ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew W. Easterday ◽  
Elizabeth M. Gerber ◽  
Daniel G. Rees Lewis

We may be able to educate social designers who can design for human needs through social innovation networks (SINs). SINs engage in three interrelated activities of: supporting design teams' project-based learning, supporting the leadership in studio-based learning communities, and continuous network improvement. SINs face challenges in diffusing social design that might be overcome through networked coaching platforms that support teams' socially-regulated learning and leaders' studio orchestration. SINs offer way to spread design education across disciplines in any organization where design teams need to both innovate and learn.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 434-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanbin Wang ◽  
Robert Blache ◽  
Xun Xu

Purpose This study aims to review the existing methods for additive manufacturing (AM) process selection and evaluate their suitability for design for additive manufacturing (DfAM). AM has experienced a rapid development in recent years. New technologies, machines and service bureaus are being brought into the market at an exciting rate. While user’s choices are in abundance, finding the right choice can be a non-trivial task. Design/methodology/approach AM process selection methods are reviewed based on decision theory. The authors also examine how the user’s preferences and AM process performances are considered and approximated into mathematical models. The pros and cons and the limitations of these methods are discussed, and a new approach has been proposed to support the iterating process of DfAM. Findings All current studies follow a sequential decision process and focus on an “a priori” articulation of preferences approach. This kind of method has limitations for the user in the early design stage to implement the DfAM process. An “a posteriori” articulation of preferences approach is proposed to support DfAM and an iterative design process. Originality/value This paper reviews AM process selection methods in a new perspective. The users need to be aware of the underlying assumptions in these methods. The limitations of these methods for DfAM are discussed, and a new approach for AM process selection is proposed.


Author(s):  
Nathan Decker ◽  
Qiang Huang

Abstract While additive manufacturing has seen tremendous growth in recent years, a number of challenges remain, including the presence of substantial geometric differences between a three dimensional (3D) printed part, and the shape that was intended. There are a number of approaches for addressing this issue, including statistical models that seek to account for errors caused by the geometry of the object being printed. Currently, these models are largely unable to account for errors generated in freeform 3D shapes. This paper proposes a new approach using machine learning with a set of predictors based on the geometric properties of the triangular mesh file used for printing. A direct advantage of this method is the simplicity with which it can describe important properties of a 3D shape and allow for predictive modeling of dimensional inaccuracies for complex parts. To evaluate the efficacy of this approach, a sample dataset of 3D printed objects and their corresponding deviations was generated. This dataset was used to train a random forest machine learning model and generate predictions of deviation for a new object. These predicted deviations were found to compare favorably to the actual deviations, demonstrating the potential of this approach for applications in error prediction and compensation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 101006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yulin Xiong ◽  
Song Yao ◽  
Zi-Long Zhao ◽  
Yi Min Xie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document