Short-term mobilization of processing resources is revealed in the event-related potential

2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 914-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Falkenstein ◽  
Jörg Hoormann ◽  
Joachim Hohnsbein ◽  
Thomas Kleinsorge
NeuroImage ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 475-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Lenk ◽  
Annet Bluschke ◽  
Christian Beste ◽  
Emilia Iannilli ◽  
Veit Rößner ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinne C. Stauffer ◽  
Rebekka Indermühle ◽  
Stefan J. Troche ◽  
Thomas H. Rammsayer

1997 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 291-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y-A. Féry ◽  
A. Ferry ◽  
A. Vom Hofe ◽  
M. Rieu

Experiments utilizing reaction time to measure the effects of fatigue on cognition must discern sensitivity of peripheral and central processing to strenuous exercise. The additive factors method enables one to stipulate that if fatigue interacts with subjects' reaction time in a decision task, central processing is affected by fatigue. While pedaling at different intensities, 13 physically-fit men had to perform a series of short-term memory tests. The tests were executed during a constant workload session and a progressive workload session in which subjects pedaled until exhaustion. Subjects provided ratings on Borg's 1970 scale to measure the psychological effects of the physical effort such as perceived exertion. Allocation of processing resources was also measured to determine attentional constraints exerted by the dual-task situation. Analysis showed that decision reaction time was affected only during the exhausting bout of the progressive workload session and for the more difficult decision task. We discuss our results in the context of arousal and the allocation of processing resources.


2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa Gierych ◽  
RafaŽ Milner ◽  
Andrzej Michalski

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to search for event-related potential (ERP) correlates of processing pictures commonly described as “funny” but not preceded by the apparent “context-setting” phase. Three pairs of stimuli were used: (1) famous cartoon characters and images of household objects, (2) pictures reminiscent of a recently seen joke and similar pictures that did not produce such associations, (3) funny caricatures and drawings of neutral human faces. ERP differences in each pair were analyzed in two experiments. In the first experiment, both stimuli were targets in an “oddball” procedure, presented among the more frequent green disks. In the second experiment, they were both nontargets whereas the green disks were task-relevant. Both experiments and all pairs of stimuli produced similar results. ERPs for funny pictures were consistently more positive within the broad latency windows, resembling the effects of emotional arousal. Negative deflections, typical for incongruity processing, were not found. Such results indicated that these types of “humorous” images belonged to the class of affective stimuli that produced attentional reallocation of processing resources. The cognitive phase during which incongruity is detected and resolved was probably reduced to minimum or even absent.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Van Pelt ◽  
Benjamin Lowe ◽  
Jonathan Robinson ◽  
Maria J. Donaldson ◽  
Patrick Johnston ◽  
...  

AbstractOnset primacy is a behavioural phenomenon whereby humans identify the appearance of an object (onset) with greater efficiency than other kinds of visual change, such as the disappearance of an object (offset). The default mode hypothesis explains this phenomenon by postulating that the attentional system is optimised for onset detection in its initial state. The present study extended this hypothesis by combining a change detection task and measurement of the P300 event-related potential (ERP), which was thought to index the amount of processing resources available to detecting onsets and offsets. In an experiment, participants indicated the locations of onsets and offsets under the condition in which they occurred equally often in the same locations across trials. Although there was no reason to prioritise detecting one type of change over the other, onsets were detected more quickly and they evoked a larger P300 than offsets. These results suggest that processing resources are preferentially allocated to onset detection. This biased allocation may be a basis on which the attentional system defaults to the ‘onset detection’ mode. Possible contributions of other ERP components to onset primacy are also discussed in the article.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document