Review of: Forensic Archaeology: The Application of Comparative Excavation Methods and Recording Systems

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1427-1428
Author(s):  
Nicholas Márquez-Grant
Author(s):  
Francisco Etxeberria ◽  
Alfredo González-Ruibal ◽  
Lourdes Herrasti ◽  
Nicholas Márquez-Grant ◽  
Laura Muñoz ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Yan ◽  
Wenbo Lu ◽  
Ming Chen ◽  
Zhigang Shan ◽  
Xiangrong Chen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. S. Sehrawat ◽  
R. K. Pathak

Forensic archaeology is a scientific discipline that can expose past crime(s) against humanity by recovering the bodies of victims and meticulously documenting any proof of torture, trauma or human rights violations. Archaeological recovery of human remains deposited in pre-existing structures or features such as wells, potholes, natural ravines, roadside trenches, sewage systems etc., have been reported from many sites worldwide. In April, 2014, thousands of human bones, teeth as well as a number of personal effects including coins, medals and beaded armbands were unscientifically excavated from a well—presumably dating from the nineteenth century—located under a religious structure in the heart a North Indian town. Without the assistance of scientific expertise or local administration, locals excavated the remains to verify whether the well containing human bones was a result of an event which had been documented in the written records. The unscientific excavation by locals with no formal qualifications in archaeology or anthropology, resulted in the enhanced damage and commingling of human remains limiting information on the minimum number of individuals, age-at-death, sex, pathological conditions, trauma, etc. which may have assisted in identification and a stronger corroboration with the historical records. This paper aims to emphasize that if scientific protocols had been followed—including the participation of a multidisciplinary excavation team with experts from diverse scientific disciplines like forensic archaeology, anthropology, geology, skeletal biology, history, forensic medicine etc.—data and context would have been greatly enhanced and information may have been obtained about the deceased individuals and whether they were the victims of crimes dating to the nineteenth century.


2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 1077-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mojtaba Golestanifar ◽  
Kamran Goshtasbi ◽  
Mostafa Jafarian ◽  
Siamak Adnani

2015 ◽  
pp. 399-406
Author(s):  
Ana Carolina Guatame García ◽  
Carolina Puerto Valdivieso ◽  
Eileen Buitrago Pérez

Author(s):  
Lisa Cooper

During Bell’s first journeys into Mesopotamia, undertaken in 1909 and 1911, she had occasion to visit the ancient sites of Babylon and Assur when they were being excavated by teams of German archaeologists. This chapter discusses in particular Bell’s visit to the ruins of the Assyrian capital of Assur, and her interactions with the site’s German director, Walter Andrae. Bell greatly admired Andrae’s excavation methods, given his attention to stratigraphy, his focus on both elite and non-elite urban contexts and his comprehensive system of architectural recording. She also valued their scholarly exchanges, which included discussions of the development of architectural forms such as the vault and the Parthian iwān. In all, Andrae had a profound effect on Bell’s archaeological scholarship, especially influencing her understanding of later Islamic architectural features such as those exhibited at the castle of Ukhaidir, and her admiration for Andrae would continue up to the end of her life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document