scholarly journals Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Education Research: The Best Publications of 2012

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Lin ◽  
Jonathan Fisher ◽  
Wendy C. Coates ◽  
Susan E. Farrell ◽  
Philip Shayne ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1274-1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Farrell ◽  
Gloria J. Kuhn ◽  
Wendy C. Coates ◽  
Phillip H. Shayne ◽  
Jonathan Fisher ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1327-1336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lalena M. Yarris ◽  
Amy Miller Juve ◽  
Wendy C. Coates ◽  
Jonathan Fisher ◽  
Corey Heitz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Gottlieb ◽  
Teresa M. Chan ◽  
Samuel O. Clarke ◽  
Jonathan S. Ilgen ◽  
Jaime Jordan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. S57
Author(s):  
D.P. Runde ◽  
J. Jordan ◽  
E. Fowlkes ◽  
S. Clarke ◽  
J. Kurth ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1468-1475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig D. Newgard ◽  
Michael S. Beeson ◽  
Chad S. Kessler ◽  
Nathan Kuppermann ◽  
Judith A. Linden ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1434-1441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther K. Choo ◽  
Rosemarie Fernandez ◽  
Emily M. Hayden ◽  
Jeffrey I. Schneider ◽  
Brian Clyne ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e045345
Author(s):  
Marie Stenberg ◽  
Elisabeth Mangrio ◽  
Mariette Bengtsson ◽  
Elisabeth Carlson

ObjectivesFormative peer assessment focuses on learning and development of the student learning process. This implies that students are taking responsibility for assessing the work of their peers by giving and receiving feedback to each other. The aim was to compile research about formative peer assessment presented in higher healthcare education, focusing on the rationale, the interventions, the experiences of students and teachers and the outcomes of formative assessment interventions.DesignA scoping review.Data sourcesSearches were conducted until May 2019 in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Education Research Complete and Education Research Centre. Grey literature was searched in Library Search, Google Scholar and Science Direct.Eligibility criteriaStudies addressing formative peer assessment in higher education, focusing on medicine, nursing, midwifery, dentistry, physical or occupational therapy and radiology published in peer-reviewed articles or in grey literature.Data extractions and synthesisOut of 1452 studies, 37 met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised using relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, Joanna Briggs Institute and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool tools. The pertinent data were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultThe critical appraisal resulted in 18 included studies with high and moderate quality. The rationale for using formative peer assessment relates to giving and receiving constructive feedback as a means to promote learning. The experience and outcome of formative peer assessment interventions from the perspective of students and teachers are presented within three themes: (1) organisation and structure of the formative peer assessment activities, (2) personal attributes and consequences for oneself and relationships and (3) experience and outcome of feedback and learning.ConclusionHealthcare education must consider preparing and introducing students to collaborative learning, and thus develop well-designed learning activities aligned with the learning outcomes. Since peer collaboration seems to affect students’ and teachers’ experiences of formative peer assessment, empirical investigations exploring collaboration between students are of utmost importance.


Author(s):  
Paul L Weygandt ◽  
Jaime Jordan ◽  
Holly Caretta‐Weyer ◽  
Anwar Osborne ◽  
Kristen Grabow Moore

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 1318-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Farrell ◽  
Wendy C. Coates ◽  
Gloria J. Khun ◽  
Jonathan Fisher ◽  
Philip Shayne ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document