scholarly journals Effectiveness of Interventions to Decrease Emergency Department Visits by Adult Frequent Users: A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Moe ◽  
Scott W. Kirkland ◽  
Erin Rawe ◽  
Maria B. Ospina ◽  
Ben Vandermeer ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 843-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingchun Fan ◽  
Shulan Li ◽  
Chunling Fan ◽  
Zhenggang Bai ◽  
Kehu Yang

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 1589-1599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Digel Vandyk ◽  
Margaret B. Harrison ◽  
Gail Macartney ◽  
Amanda Ross-White ◽  
Dawn Stacey

Health Policy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 452-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley J.J. Soril ◽  
Laura E. Leggett ◽  
Diane L. Lorenzetti ◽  
Tom W. Noseworthy ◽  
Fiona M. Clement

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S30-S30 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Edwards ◽  
J. Hayden ◽  
K. Magee ◽  
M. Asbridge

Introduction: Low back pain (LBP) may be having a significant impact on emergency departments (ED) around the world. Two analyses conducted in the USA and Australia suggest that LBP is one of the leading causes of emergency department visits. However, in the peer-reviewed literature, there has been limited focus on the prevalence and management of back pain in the ED setting. Furthermore, the applicability of the available research to our local ED setting is unclear. Methods: This project includes two studies to investigate the prevalence of LBP in the ED: 1. a comprehensive systematic review of the published literature to gather a comprehensive and global perspective about the prevalence of LBP in the ED setting, and 2. a retrospective cross sectional analysis using six years of data from our local ED, the Charles V. Keating Emergency and Trauma Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Results: Searches from multiple databases including PubMed (392 citations), resulted in 3024 citations, of which 20 studies were found to have prevalence data for LBP. Studies were reported between 2001–2015 and used mixed methods of data collection, including electronic databases, surveys and patient charts. Ranges for prevalence estimates were 1.9% to 17% of patient visits. Results indicated there are many gaps in the literature, for example research in rural EDs and in Canada. In our primary study, we have identified a sample of 10 000 patients presenting with LBP to our local ED. Analysis of this data will be completed prior to the CAEP conference. Conclusion: This project is the first systematic review; comprehensive search strategy to examine the prevalence of LBP in the ED. It is also the first project to assess the prevalence of LBP in a Canadian ED. Results from this study will inform healthcare providers, as well as administrative and policy decision-makers, of the global and local impact of LBP in the ED, and will identify opportunities for further research to enhance care pathways of patients suffering from LBP.


2013 ◽  
Vol 163 (2) ◽  
pp. 477-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Zed ◽  
Christopher Haughn ◽  
Karen J.L. Black ◽  
Eleanor A. Fitzpatrick ◽  
Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document