To infiltrate or not? Acute effects of local anaesthetic in breast surgery

2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 353-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Campbell ◽  
Shelley Cavanagh ◽  
Jane Creighton ◽  
Rowan French ◽  
Shramana Banerjee ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. S36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Brown ◽  
Elizabeth Gordon ◽  
Douglas Ferguson

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 364-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Chaudhry ◽  
S Hallam ◽  
A Chambers ◽  
AK Sahu ◽  
S Govindarajulu ◽  
...  

Introduction Postoperative pain after breast surgery is one of the major factors contributing to delay in mobilisation and prolonged hospital stay. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients undergoing skin sparing mastectomy and insertion of a subpectoral implant. The aim was to determine whether the use of an elastomeric local anaesthetic pump improved pain control and length of stay. Methods Twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing the above procedure were sited with an elastomeric local anaesthetic infusion pump intraoperatively, in addition to standard regular and pro re nata analgesia. The control group comprised 25 patients undergoing the same procedure in the same year who received standard analgesia alone. Visual analogue scale scores were recorded for the duration of inpatient stay, as was any further analgesic requirement. Results The median age was 51 years (range: 26–75 years) in the intervention group and 50 years (range: 28–70 years) in the control group. The mean visual analogue scale score was 0.28 (standard deviation [SD]: 0.61) at 24 hours for the intervention group and 1.84 (SD: 0.37) for the control group (p<0.0001). The mean length of stay was 1.8 days (SD: 0.71 days) for the intervention group and 2.28 days (SD: 0.94 days) for the control group (p=0.15). There were no complications involving catheter placement, leakage or toxicity relating to use of the local anaesthetic. Conclusions There was significantly reduced pain with the use of the local anaesthetic infusion pump. The elastomeric pump is a step towards enhanced patient recovery after breast surgery in the case of skin sparing mastectomy and subpectoral tissue expander reconstruction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. e1
Author(s):  
Charef Raslan ◽  
Andy Ng ◽  
David Archampong ◽  
Debasish Debnath ◽  
Pasupathy Kiruparan

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.K.G. Raghavendra ◽  
R.H. Sreenivasa ◽  
K. Ashok ◽  
P. Chitsabesan ◽  
N.R. McLean ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 1981-84
Author(s):  
Usman Saqib ◽  
Rashid Iqbal ◽  
Sana Usman ◽  
Rashid Hanif

Objective: To compare the frequency of pain and mean analgesia requirement after breast surgery under general anaesthesia when comparing pectoral nerve block with local anaesthesia infiltration. Study Design: Comparative prospective study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi from Mar 2018 to Sep 2019. Methodology: A total of 60 patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were included in the study. Group A (n=30) received pectoral nerve blocks while Group B (n=30) received local anaesthetic infiltration. Outcome was assessed at 12 hours after injection of local anaesthetic. Results: Pain in 7 (23.33%) patients in Group A (Pectoral nerve blocks) and in 20 (66.67%) patients in Group B (Local anaesthetic infiltration), p-value of 0.001 which was considered statistically significant. Mean analgesic requirement was found to be 80 ± 33.73 mg in the Group A (pectoral nerve blocks) compared with 141.67 ± 47.50 mg in Group B (Local anaesthesia infiltration) patients with a p-value of <0.001 which was statistically significant. Conclusion: Pectoral nerve block significantly reduces early postoperative pain and analgesia requirement when compared with Local anaesthesia infiltration after breast surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document