scholarly journals COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED MODIFIED PECTORAL NERVE BLOCK WITH LOCAL ANAESTHESTIC INFILTRATION FOR ANALGESIA IN BREAST CANCER SURGERY

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 1981-84
Author(s):  
Usman Saqib ◽  
Rashid Iqbal ◽  
Sana Usman ◽  
Rashid Hanif
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Pectoral Nerve ◽  
Analgesia Requirement ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the frequency of pain and mean analgesia requirement after breast surgery under general anaesthesia when comparing pectoral nerve block with local anaesthesia infiltration. Study Design: Comparative prospective study. Place and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi from Mar 2018 to Sep 2019. Methodology: A total of 60 patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were included in the study. Group A (n=30) received pectoral nerve blocks while Group B (n=30) received local anaesthetic infiltration. Outcome was assessed at 12 hours after injection of local anaesthetic. Results: Pain in 7 (23.33%) patients in Group A (Pectoral nerve blocks) and in 20 (66.67%) patients in Group B (Local anaesthetic infiltration), p-value of 0.001 which was considered statistically significant. Mean analgesic requirement was found to be 80 ± 33.73 mg in the Group A (pectoral nerve blocks) compared with 141.67 ± 47.50 mg in Group B (Local anaesthesia infiltration) patients with a p-value of <0.001 which was statistically significant. Conclusion: Pectoral nerve block significantly reduces early postoperative pain and analgesia requirement when compared with Local anaesthesia infiltration after breast surgery.

scholarly journals Effect of Anaesthesiologists’ Experience on Preferred Technique and Volume of Local Anaesthetic Administered for Brachial Plexus Nerve Block: A Retrospective Observational Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Depinder Kaur ◽  
Reena Mahajan ◽  
Shiv Kumar Singh ◽  
Suchitra Malhotra
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Failure Rate ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Block Group ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Blocks ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Faculty and Residents are trained in peripheral nerve blocks guided by blind technique, Peripheral Neuro Stimulator (PNS) or Ultrasound (USG) guided technique. But due to unavailability of USG machine in all institutes and requiring special training, techniques used for peripheral nerve blocks vary from institute to institute. Aim: To analyse the effect of anaesthesiologists’ experience on preferred technique and Local Anaesthetic (LA) volume used for brachial plexus nerve block retrospectively. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 129 adults American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II patients requiring brachial plexus nerve block for upper limb orthopaedic surgical anaesthesia for both elective and emergency surgery were divided into three groups for each year depending on technique for nerve block used. Group A: Received USG guided (Micromaxx Sonosite Inc, USA) brachial plexus nerve block. Group B: Received peripheral nerve stimulator (Inmed) guided brachial plexus nerve block. Group C: Received brachial plexus nerve block by traditional anatomical landmark based paraesthesia elicitation blind technique. Patients with inadequate surgical analgesia were given general anaesthesia and were categorised as failure rate. Year wise demographic data, type of technique used for giving brachial plexus nerve block, volume of drug used, failure rate, complications observed were collected and analysed by Student’s t-test and Chi-square test. Results: USG guided technique was the most prefered technique in both years (57.6%, n=38 in year 2018 and 49.2%, n=31 in year 2019). In remaining nearly half of the patients PNS and blind technique was used (PNS 24.2%, n=16 in year 2018 and 20.6%, n=13 in year 2019; blind technique 18.2%, n=12 in year 2018 and 30.2%, n=19 in year 2019). Significantly, less volume of LA drug (mL) was used in group A in year 2019 (16.43±6.07) than in year 2018 (22.34±4.75) (p<0.001). Failure rate in group A in year 2019 (3.2%) was significantly less than in year 2018 (5.2%), but the difference was insignificant in all three groups. In group A, no complications were observed in year 2019 while one incidence of hemidiaphragm paralysis was observed in year 2018, while in group B and C, complications were observed in both years. Conclusion: USG guided nerve block was the most preferred technique for nerve block in the study institute. In 24 months observation period, with increasing experience with USG there was significant increase in success rate and decrease in the volume of LA administered and complications.

Analgesia and anaesthesia

2020 ◽  
pp. 281-327
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Wyatt ◽  
Robert G. Taylor ◽  
Kerstin de Wit ◽  
Emily J. Hotton ◽  
Robin J. Illingworth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Femoral Nerve Block ◽  
Rapid Sequence Induction ◽  
Femoral Nerve ◽  
General Anaesthetic ◽  
Intravenous Sedation ◽  
Nerve Blocks

This chapter in the Oxford Handbook of Emergency Medicine investigates analgesia and anaesthesia in the emergency department (ED). It looks at options for relieving pain, such as the analgesics aspirin, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), morphine and other opioids, Entonox®, and ketamine, and explores analgesia for trauma and other specific situations. It discusses local anaesthesia (LA) and local anaesthetic toxicity, including use of adrenaline (epinephrine) and general principles of local anaesthesia. It explores blocks such as Bier’s block, local anaesthetic nerve blocks, intercostal nerve block, digital nerve block, median and ulnar nerve blocks, radial nerve block at the wrist, dental anaesthesia, nerve blocks of the forehead and ear, fascia iliaca compartment block, femoral nerve block, and nerve blocks at the ankle. It examines sedation, including drugs for intravenous sedation and sedation in children, and discusses general anaesthesia in the emergency department, emergency anaesthesia and rapid sequence induction, difficult intubation, and general anaesthetic drugs.

scholarly journals Penile nerve block at the base of penis in combination with intravenous ketamin plus midazolam versus general anaesthesia(GA) in children undergoing circumcision for post operative pain management in the Eastern Nepal

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-36
Author(s):  
NR Sharma ◽  
P Timalsena ◽  
U Rai
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Single Shot ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Analgesia Requirement ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Adequate post operative analgesia in children provides satisfactory psychological objective of this study was to compare the post operative analgesia requirement and child satisfaction between two groups, general anaesthesia(GA) alone and GA in combination with penile nerve block. This prospective randomized study was conducted in 50 children aged 6 to 14 years, who underwent circumcision. The boys were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A (n = 25) received GA with Single shot ketamin 2mg/kg IV plus midazolam 0.1 mg/kg and dorsal penile nerve block at the base of penis prior to circumcision with and Group B (n = 25) received GA with ketamine 2mg/kg IV plus midazolam 0.1 mg/kg plus halothane by laryngeal mask. Severity of pain was assessed quantitatively by children’s hospital eastern Ontario pain scale (CHEOPS). The pain intensity was assessed at one hour A1 in group A and B1 for group B and at two hour A2 for group A and B2 for group B during postoperatively period for two hours. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS method. The post operative analgesia was satisfactory with CHEOPS score 6 or <6 in group A 1. In group A 2 twenty two out of twenty five cases had CHEOPS score <6.Where as in group B1 and B2 it was > 6 .Which was statistically 100% significant. In conclu­sion, combined penile nerve block in combination with intravenous ketamine plus midazolam is the satisfactory method of Post operative pain management in children undergoing circumcision. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jcmc.v4i1.10846 Journal of Chitwan Medical College 2014; 4(1): 33-36

COMPARISON OF THE ONSET OF SENSORY BLOCK USING LIDOCAINE 1.5% WITH ADRENALINE OR LIDOCAINE 1.5% WITH ADRENALINE AND DEXAMETHASONE IN ULTRASOUND GUIDED AXILLARY NERVE BLOCK FOR BELOW ELBOW SURGERIES

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 2337-2339
Author(s):  
Nabaa Adnan Ahmed ◽  
Alaa Hussein Altaei ◽  
Mohammed Adel Jasim
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Axillary Nerve ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group B

The aim: To demonstrate the onset of dexamethasone when added to lidocaine in ultrasound regional axillary brachial block. Materials and methods: 30 patients participated in this study in Al-wasity hospital from June 1st to December 1st 2019; all were of ASA I-II type, aged 18-65 years old. All patients were scheduled for upper limb below elbow surgery with peripheral nerve block. They were divided randomly in to 2 groups: Group A: received 20 ml of lidocaine 1.5% with adrenaline 1:200000; Group 2 : received 20 ml of lidocaine with adrenaline and dexamethasone 8 mg. There was no significant differences among the groups regarding the change in pulse rate, MAP and Oxygen saturation. The group B was faster than group A (p value < 0.001) in both the time of cold sensory block onset and pinprick sensory block onset at all dermatome (C5,C6,C7,C8,T1). Results: A variety of adjuvants have been used with peripheral nerve block to decrease the onset time, improve block quality, and prolong analgesia. Steroids have been shown to be beneficial in improving block onset. Conclusions: Adding dexamethasone to lidocaine enhanced the onset time of the block with no hemodynamic effect.

Comparing approaches to sciatic nerve blocks in dogs during tibial plateau-levelling osteotomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Robyn Thomson ◽  
Delphine Le Chevallier ◽  
Emma Love ◽  
Jo Murrell
Keyword(s):  
Sciatic Nerve ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Sciatic Nerve Block ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Transgluteal Approach ◽  
Block Number ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Approach Group

The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic requirements in dogs receiving a sciatic nerve block by either the lateral or transgluteal approach. The secondary aim was to determine if there was a difference in ease of performing the nerve block. Forty-two client-owned dogs were used in this study. Sciatic nerve block was performed by the transgluteal approach (group A), or the lateral approach (group B) combined with a psoas compartment block. All blocks were performed using a nerve stimulator and 0.1 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.5%, per block. The time taken to perform the sciatic nerve block, number of attempts, the current (mA), and intraoperative and postoperative opioid requirements were recorded. Overall, 52% of dogs required methadone intraoperatively, with no difference between groups (P=0.516). Postoperatively, 24% in group A and 12% in group B required methadone (P=0.314). There was no difference in the time taken to perform the sciatic nerve block, current or the number of attempts between groups. Both approaches to the sciatic nerve block conferred similar levels of analgesia and may be used as part of a multimodal analgesic protocol for dogs undergoing pelvic limb surgery.

scholarly journals Comparison of intraincisional and intraperitoneal infiltration of local anaesthetic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy to control early postoperative pain.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (02) ◽  
pp. 192-196
Author(s):  
Nadia Bano ◽  
Nazim Hayat ◽  
Saira Saleem ◽  
Farhan Javaid ◽  
Ayesha Rehman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
P Value ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the effects of intraincisional and intraperitoneal infiltration of local anaesthetic to relieve early postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Study Design: Randomized Control Trial. Setting: Department of Anaesthesia and Surgery, Madinah Teaching Hospital Faisalabad. Period: July 2017 to March 2018. Material & Methods: A sample of 100 patients with American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical status (ASA) I and II, undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected using simple random sampling technique. Patients were randomly assigned into groups A and B. Group A patients received intraperitoneal infiltration of 20 ml solution of 0.25% bupivacaine and group B patients received intraincisional infiltration of 20 ml solution of 0.25% bupivacaine. Results:  Demographic characteristics were not significantly different in both groups. Our study showed that Group A patients had better pain relief as compared to group B patients. Visual analogue score (VAS) for pain relief at 0, 3,6,12 and 24 hours was statistically different in both groups. The requirement of rescue analgesia between group A and B was found to be12% and 38% which is statically significant (p value 0.003). Conclusion: intraperitoneal infiltration of Bupivacaine offers better postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and is associated with less analgesic requirement in early postoperative period.

scholarly journals Effects of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia in Adults Undergoing Elective Infra-umbilical Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (208) ◽  
pp. 379-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binod Gautam ◽  
Sujata Niroula ◽  
Mona Sharma ◽  
Sushila Moktan Lama
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Various adjuvants to local anaesthetic are used to improve quality and duration of spinal anaesthesia. Dexmedetomidine, a novel alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, has been proposed to augment local anaesthetic effects. This study aims to investigate effects of intrathecal Dexmedetomidine on duration of analgesia and duration of sensory block during spinal anaesthesia. Methods: In this randomized double-blind study 38 patients were allocated into each of two groups. Otherwise healthy patients (18 to 75 years) scheduled for inguinal hernia repair or vaginal hysterectomy were included. For spinal anaesthesia, Group A received 2.5 ml hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5%, whereas Group B received five micrograms intrathecal Dexmedetomidine in addition. Characteristics of sensory and motor blocks, duration of analgesia, analgesic requirements, and side effects were studied for 24 hours. Student’s t-test for quantitative variables and Chi- squared test for qualitative variables were used for statistical analysis. Results: Duration of analgesia was prolonged in Group B (326 min ±91) as compared to 217 min ±98 in Group A (P value <0.05). Sensory and motor block durations were significantly prolonged in Group B. Time taken to reach significant peak sensory block level was earlier in Group B. Significant reductions in incidence of visceral pain, shivering and analgesic requirements were observed in Dexmedetomidine group, without increased need of medications for altered hemodynamic parameters. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidineas an intrathecal adjuvant to hyperbaric Bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia prolongs duration of analgesia and sensory block with minimal adverse effects. Keywords: Bupivacaine; Dexmedetomidine; intrathecal adjuvant; spinal anaesthesia.

The analgesic effects of combined pectoral nerve blocks versus combined serratus anterior plane block and pecto-intercostal fascial plane block in breast surgery

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hany Mohamed Mohamed ElZahaby ◽  
Sahar Mohamed Talaat ◽  
Mohamed Mohamed Abd El FattahGhoneim ◽  
Manar Mohsen Ahmed Matared
Keyword(s):  
Breast Surgery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Serratus Anterior ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Analgesic Effects ◽  
Pectoral Nerve ◽  
Fascial Plane Block ◽  
Anterior Plane ◽  
Fascial Plane

Abstract Background Poorly controlled acute pain after breast surgery is associated with a variety of unwanted post-operative consequences, including patient suffering, distress, respiratory complications, prolonged hospital stay and increased likelihood of chronic pain. The analgesic regimen used for postoperative pain control needs to meet the goals of providing safe, effective analgesia, with minimal side effects for the patient. Objective The aim of this study is to compare the intra-operative and the post-operative analgesic effects of the thoracic interfascial plane blocks (serratus anterior plane block in combination with pecto-intercostal fascial plane block) and pectoral nerve blocks (PECS I and II)in patients undergoing non-reconstructive breast surgeries. Patients and Methods The study was conducted on 50 randomly chosen patients in Ain Shams University General Surgery Hospital after approval of the medical ethical committee. They were allocated in two groups of 25 patients each. The two groups were compared regarding analgesic outcome by using the visual analogue scaling system in the first 24 hours postoperative and the patients' satisfaction using verbal rating scale and this was the primary outcome of our study. The amount of fentanyl consumed intra-operative, time for first call for rescue analgesia and the frequency of using it were recorded and compared to achieve the secondary outcome of the study which included reducing opiods requirements and avoiding their side effects. Results The study found that the total amount of intra-operative fentanyl consumption was significantly higher in the SAPB and PIFB group than the Pecs group with the range of 100-150 versus 100-200 micg fentanyl respectively, and the VAS was significantly higher in the combination of serratus anterior plane block and pecto-intercostal fascial plane block compared to Pecs I and II at 8th, 12th and 24th hours post operatively with p value 0.018, 0.022 and 0.032 respectively, also the frequency of administration of rescue analgesia was higher in the SABP and PIFB group with the range of (2 to 3) times in PECS I and II group versus (2 to 5) in SABP/PIFB group. Besides, the first request of post-operative morphine was significantly delayed in the pectoral nerve blocks than the SABP and PIFB group with the p value (0.020). Conclusion The present study found that Pecs I and II group provided superior intra-operative and post-operative analgesic control compared to the serratus and PIFB group in patients undergoing non-reconstructive breast surgeries.

scholarly journals SURGERIES OF LOWER LIMB UNDER COMBINED FEMORAL AND SCIATIC NERVE BLOCK

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Pawan Kumar Agrawal ◽  
Dr. Anil Kumar Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Sciatic Nerve ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Femoral Nerve Block ◽  
Femoral Nerve ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Sciatic Nerve Block ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

INTRODUCTION:  Peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) can provide surgical anesthesia with better cardiorespiratory stability and is the best option for life-saving procedures  where both general and central neuraxialanesthesia are risky, and no fasting, , or preoperative optimization is required. One of the most useful anesthetic technique is the combination of sciatic and femoral nerve block (3:1) for lower limb surgery. Peripheral nerve blocks are generally suitable for lower limb surgeries because of the peripheral location and the potential to block pain pathways at multiple levels. Also PNBs avoid hemodynamic instability and, facilitate postoperative pain management, and assure a timely discharge of the patient. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study 50 patients of 22 to 67 years age group of both sexes were included who were posted for lower limb surgeries. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of 25 each. In Group A: 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine for femoral nerve block and 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block was given to the patients. In group B: 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 25 µg fentanyl for femoral nerve block and 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine plus fentanyl 25 µg for sciatic nerve block was given. Visual analog scale (VAS) with 0 – 10 cm line was used to see the level of anesthesia in the postoperative period and interpreted as “0” means “no pain” and mark “10” means “severe pain.” Pain score was assessed every 30 min during surgery. If pain is experienced during surgery injection ketamine 0.5 mg/kg intravenously. RESULTS: This study was carried out on 50 patients divided into two groups of 25 each of age group of 22 to 67 years posted for lower limb surgeries. In group A mean age of the patients was 43.78± 12.47and in group B it was 42.33± 13.29. Out of total 25 patients operated in group A 21 (84%) were male and 4 (16%) female, while in group B male and female were 22 (88%) and 3 (12%) respectively. Mean onset of sensory block (Minutes) in group A and Group B was 11.94 ± 3.54 and 12.19 ± 2.67 respectively. Mean onset of motor block in group A was 17.59 ±3.47 minutes and in group B was17.87± 2.78 minutes. Total duration of sensory block in group A was 13.96 ± 0.27 hours and in group B 13.05 ± 0.98 hours. Total duration of motor block in group A was11.58 ± 1.56 hours and in group B12.88 ± 0.96 hours. VAS score was 0 till 8 hours of the study period then it started increasing in both the groups. Patients demanded the first dose of rescue analgesia at 16th hour.  CONCLUSION: Combined femoral-sciatic nerve block is one of the most useful anesthetic procedures and can be used without any major complications, it can also be used in critically ill patients.

COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF MOBILIZATION AND SELF-EXERCISES IN ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS OF SHOULDER

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-41
Author(s):  
Muhammad Usman Khan ◽  
Ghazala Noor Nizami ◽  
Ali Farhad
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Adhesive Capsulitis ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
T Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of mobilization and self-exercises in the management of adhesive capsulitis of shoulder STUDY DESIGN Randomized Control Trial SAMPLE SELECTION 30 patients of adhesive capsulitis of shoulder from physiotherapy department of tertiary care hospitals of Karachi were selected through simple random sampling technique. PROCEDURE Treatment was continued for 5 days per week for the period of 3 weeks followed by assessment. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A was treated with midrange mobilization while group B performed self-exercises. Both groups received TENS and hot pack prior to the exercises. Mean ± SD, frequencies and percentages were used for descriptive analysis. ROM via goniometry and pain intensity through VAS was analyzed by paired t-test within the groups and by independent t-test between the groups, using SPSS. P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS 60% were females (n=18) and 40% were males (n=12) with mean age of 50.17±6.37 years. Significant improvement (p-value <0.05) in pain and shoulder ROM was observed among patients of Group A as compared to Group B. Pain intensity was decreased to 1.67 ± 0.62 in group A, whereas ROMs in these patients were also better than other group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document