Femoral side‐only revision options for the Birmingham resurfacing arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (9) ◽  
pp. 1016-1021
Author(s):  
Mun Khin Chan ◽  
Michelle Caudwell ◽  
Andrew Suchowersky ◽  
Andrew Ashton
Keyword(s):  
Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Side

scholarly journals Return to Sport After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596712110035
Author(s):  
Kyle W. Morse ◽  
Ajay Premkumar ◽  
Andrew Zhu ◽  
Rachelle Morgenstern ◽  
Edwin P. Su
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
High Impact ◽  
Professional Athletes ◽  
Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Elite Level ◽  
Performance Statistics ◽  
And Performance ◽  
End Stage

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement and degenerative hip osteoarthritis (OA) affect athletes across a wide variety of sports. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) has emerged as a surgical treatment for active individuals with end-stage hip OA to provide pain relief and allow return to high-impact activities. Return to professional sports after HRA has not been well characterized. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to report on a series of elite athletes in a variety of sports who underwent HRA. We hypothesized that professional and elite-level athletes would be able to return to sports after HRA for end-stage hip OA. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective case series was conducted on professional athletes who underwent HRA at a single institution between 2007 and 2017. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using the posterolateral approach. Athletes’ return to play and sport-specific performance statistics were obtained using self-reported and publicly available data sources. Athletes were matched to an age- and performance-based cohort to determine changes in performance-based metrics. Results: Eight professional athletes were identified, including 2 baseball pitchers, 1 ice hockey defenseman, 1 foil fencer, 1 men’s doubles tennis player, 1 basketball player, 1 ultramarathoner, and 1 Ironman triathlete. All 8 patients returned to sports; 6 of 8 (75%) patients were able to return for at least 1 full season at a professional level after surgery. There were no significant differences between performance statistics for athletes who returned to play and their preoperative performance measures for the years leading up to surgery or the age- and performance-matched cohort. Conclusion: HRA remains a surgical alternative for end-stage hip OA in young, high-impact, active patients. While the primary goals of surgery are pain control and quality of life improvement, it is possible to return to elite-level sporting activity after HRA.

A Comparison of Clinical Results of Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty and 28 mm Metal on Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomised Trial with 3–6 Years Follow-Up

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal-André Vendittoli ◽  
Muthu Ganapathi ◽  
Alain G. Roy ◽  
Daniel Lusignan ◽  
Martin Lavigne
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Metal On Metal

Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty

2007 ◽  
Vol 221 (7) ◽  
pp. 713-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Hodgson ◽  
N Helmy ◽  
B A Masri ◽  
N V Greidanus ◽  
K B Inkpen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Computer Assisted Surgery ◽  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Comparable Amount ◽  
Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Position And Orientation ◽  
Version Measurement

The orientation of the femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty affects the likelihood of loosening and fracture. Computer-assisted surgery has been shown to improve significantly the surgeon's ability to achieve a desired position and orientation; nevertheless, both bias and variability in positioning remain and can potentially be improved. The authors recently developed a computer-assisted surgical (CAS) technique to guide the placement of the pin used in femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty and showed that it produced significantly less variation than a typical manual technique in varus/valgus placement relative to a pre-operatively determined surgical plan while taking a comparable amount of time. In the present study, the repeatability of both the CAS and manual techniques is evaluated in order to estimate the relative contributions to overall variability of surgical technique (CAS versus manual), surgeon experience (novice versus experienced), and other sources of variability (e.g. across specimens and across surgeons). This will enable further improvements in the accuracy of CAS techniques. Three residents/fellows new to femoral head resurfacing and three experienced hip arthroplasty surgeons performed 20-30 repetitions of each of the CAS and manual techniques on at least one of four cadaveric femur specimens. The CAS system had markedly better repeatability (1.2°) in varus/valgus placement relative to the manual technique (2.8°), slightly worse repeatability in version (4.4° versus 3.2°), markedly better repeatability in mid-neck placement (0.7 mm versus 2.5 mm), no significant dependence on surgeon skill level (in contrast to the manual technique), and took significantly less time (50 s versus 123 s). Proposed improvements to the version measurement process showed potential for reducing the standard deviation by almost two thirds. This study supports the use of CAS for femoral head resurfacing as it is quicker than the manual technique, independent of surgeon experience, and demonstrates improved repeatability.

Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 61-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin L. Buergi ◽  
William L. Walter
Keyword(s):  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Resurfacing Arthroplasty

The effect of total hip and hip resurfacing arthroplasty on vertical ground reaction force and impulse symmetry during a sit-to-stand task

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1164-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Caplan ◽  
S. Stewart ◽  
S. Kashyap ◽  
P. Banaszkiewicz ◽  
A. St Clair Gibson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Sit To Stand ◽  
Vertical Ground

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: The evolution of contemporary designs

2006 ◽  
Vol 220 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Grigoris ◽  
P Roberts ◽  
K Panousis ◽  
Z Jin
Keyword(s):  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Resurfacing Arthroplasty

The impact of seating forces from a cementless femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty on the femoral head – A cadaver study using μ-CT analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Lerch ◽  
Gavin Olender ◽  
Nina Angrisani ◽  
Dina Rittershaus ◽  
Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Cadaver Study ◽  
Hip Resurfacing ◽  
Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Resurfacing Arthroplasty ◽  
Ct Analysis ◽  
Cementless Femoral Component ◽  
The Impact

Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip

2004 ◽  
Vol 86-B (2) ◽  
pp. 157-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Villar
Keyword(s):  
Resurfacing Arthroplasty
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document