scholarly journals Placental pulsatility index: a new, more sensitive parameter for predicting adverse outcome in pregnancies suspected of fetal growth restriction

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saemundur Gudmundsson ◽  
Kari Flo ◽  
Gisela Ghosh ◽  
Tom Wilsgaard ◽  
Ganesh Acharya
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Pulsatility Index ◽  
Adverse Outcome ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Sensitive Parameter

PP116. Circulating PlGF can help predict preeclampsia and adverse outcome in patients with suspected preeclampsia or fetal growth restriction

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sibiude ◽  
M.-D. Dionne ◽  
J. Guibourdenche ◽  
C. Le Ray ◽  
O. Anselem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Adverse Outcome ◽  
Growth Restriction

scholarly journals 497: Angiogenic factors vs. standard evaluation in the prediction of adverse outcome among pregnancies with suspected fetal growth restriction

2018 ◽  
Vol 218 (1) ◽  
pp. S297-S298
Author(s):  
Ofer Beharier ◽  
shani Swissa ◽  
Irit Szaingurten-Solodkin ◽  
Asnat Walfisch ◽  
shimrt Yaniv-Salem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Adverse Outcome ◽  
Angiogenic Factors ◽  
Growth Restriction

scholarly journals 421: Comparison of umbilical vein flow with umbilical artery pulsatility index in fetal growth restriction

2019 ◽  
Vol 220 (1) ◽  
pp. S286
Author(s):  
Jonathan G. Steller ◽  
Diane Gumina ◽  
Allison Gillan ◽  
Shane Reeves ◽  
John Hobbins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Pulsatility Index ◽  
Umbilical Artery ◽  
Umbilical Vein ◽  
Growth Restriction

388: Combined sonographic testing index (CSTI) and prediction of adverse outcome in preterm fetal growth restriction (FGR)

2013 ◽  
Vol 208 (1) ◽  
pp. S171
Author(s):  
Anthony Odibo ◽  
Katherine Goetzinger ◽  
Alison Cahill ◽  
Linda Odibo ◽  
George Macones
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Adverse Outcome ◽  
Growth Restriction

scholarly journals Circulating C19MC MicroRNAs in Preeclampsia, Gestational Hypertension, and Fetal Growth Restriction

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilona Hromadnikova ◽  
Katerina Kotlabova ◽  
Marketa Ondrackova ◽  
Andrea Kestlerova ◽  
Veronika Novotna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Perinatal Outcome ◽  
Pulsatility Index ◽  
Gestational Hypertension ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Cerebroplacental Ratio ◽  
Severity Of The Disease ◽  
Ultrasound Parameters

The objective of the study was to identify the profile of circulating C19MC microRNAs (miR-516-5p, miR-517*, miR-518b, miR-520a*, miR-520h, miR-525, and miR-526a) in patients with established preeclampsia (n=63), fetal growth restriction (n=27), and gestational hypertension (n=23). We examined the correlation between plasmatic concentrations and expression levels of microRNAs and the severity of the disease with respect to clinical signs, requirements for the delivery, and Doppler ultrasound parameters. Using absolute and relative quantification approaches, increased extracellular C19MC microRNA levels (miR-516-5p,P=0.037,P=0.009; miR-517*,P=0.033,P=0.043; miR-520a*,P=0.001,P=0.009; miR-525,P=0.026,P=0.01; miR-526a,P=0.03,P=0.035) were detected in patients with preeclampsia. The association analysis pointed to no relationship between C19MC microRNA plasmatic concentrations and expression profile and identified risk factors for a poorer perinatal outcome. However, the dependence between the levels of plasmatic C19MC microRNAs and the pulsatility index in the middle cerebral artery and the values of cerebroplacental ratio was demonstrated. The study brought the interesting finding that the upregulation of miR-516-5p, miR-517*, miR-520a*, miR-525, and miR-526a is a characteristic phenomenon of established preeclampsia.

Ultrasound biometry and fetal growth restriction

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Gardosi
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Fetal Growth Restriction ◽  
Umbilical Artery ◽  
Adverse Outcome ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Doppler Velocimetry ◽  
Doppler Flow ◽  
Biophysical Profile ◽  
Flow Velocimetry

With the ascendancy of biophysical assessment with Doppler velocimetry, and the establishment of routine scan dating in early pregnancy, there needs to be a radical re-think of the role of ultrasound biometry in the definition and assessment of fetal growth restriction (FGR).Doppler flow velocimetry of the umbilical artery has proven its value in defining the FGR fetus. It is more useful than cardiotocography (CTG) or biophysical profile scoring. However, the sensitivity of any test depends on the prevalence of the condition being looked for. While Doppler is of value in fetuses which are small-for-gestational age (SGA), it is less useful in predicting growth restriction or adverse outcome in the general population. The question is therefore, how to detect those pregnancies for which further fetal assessment is indicated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document