Application of11C-acetate positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

2013 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 1062-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beheshti Mohsen ◽  
Treglia Giorgio ◽  
Zakavi Seyed Rasoul ◽  
Langsteger Werner ◽  
Ghodsi Rad Mohammad Ali ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e052277
Author(s):  
Yi Zhao ◽  
Naomi Morka ◽  
Benjamin Scott S Simpson ◽  
Alex Freeman ◽  
Alex Kirkham ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe introduction of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has improved almost every aspect of the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. However, the novel imaging technique, prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) may have demonstrable accuracy in detecting and staging prostate cancer. Here, we describe a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mpMRI to PSMA PET for the diagnosis of suspected prostate cancer.Methods and analysisA systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane databases will be conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines will be followed for screening, data extraction, statistical analysis and reporting. Included papers will be full-text articles providing original data, written in English articles and comparing the use of PSMA PET with mpMRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. All studies published between July 1977 and March 2021 will be eligible for inclusion. Study bias and quality will be assessed using Quadas-2 score. To ensure the quality of the reporting of studies, this protocol is written following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 checklist.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval will not be required for this systematic review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at both national and international conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021239296.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Bhatia ◽  
R Ramirez ◽  
B Narasimhan ◽  
S Walsh ◽  
K Sud ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Sarcoidosis is a chronic inflammatory disorder of unclear etiology, characterized by the presence of non-caseating granulomas. Cardiac involvement occurs in upto 27 percent of patients, manifesting as atrioventricular blocks, ventricular arrhythmia or sudden cardiac death. Current guidelines cite insufficient evidence for the prognostic utility of positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to ascertain the prognostic significance of PET imaging in patients with suspected or diagnosed cardiac sarcoidosis. Purpose To review current literature and determine if PET has prognostic utility in patients with known or suspected cardiac sarcoidosis Methods We performed a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases (Embase, Medline and Web of Science) using MeSH terms and keywords for sarcoidosis and PET from inception through December 2019. Studies were eligible if they included patients with known and/or suspected cardiac sarcoidosis undergoing evaluation by PET with or without perfusion imaging and reported clinical events of interest. An abnormal PET study was defined as the presence of focal or focal-on-diffuse uptake of 18- fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG) by visual analysis. In studies with perfusion imaging, patients with only perfusion defects were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including sustained ventricular tachycardia, sudden cardiac death. Secondary analysis studied association of MACE with focal right ventricular (RV) uptake in patients with an abnormal PET study. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity of results among the studies was assessed using the Higgins I2 value. Results Out of a total of 1645 citations, 40 were selected for full-text review. Five studies were included in the final analysis with a total of 465 patients. mean follow-up was 2.3 years. Three of the five studies also reported frequency of abnormal RV uptake of 18-FDG. Patients with abnormal 18-FDG uptake on visual assessment had higher odds of MACE (OR 3.12, CI 1.9–5.01, p<0.00001), compared to known or suspected cardiac sarcoid patients with normal PET studies. Heterogeneity among studies was low (I2 = 0). In patients with an abnormal PET study, abnormal focal RV uptake of 18-FDG was associated with higher odds of MACE (OR 5.24, CI 1.1–25.1, p=0.04), with moderate heterogeneity among studies (I2=41). Conclusion In patients undergoing PET imaging for known or suspected cardiac sarcoidosis, abnormal metabolism on visual analysis is associated with increased risk of MACE. Furthermore, focal RV uptake further increases the risk of MACE in patients with abnormal PET imaging. Thus, PET imaging can serve as a tool to risk stratify patients with known or suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. Forrest Plots Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document