MABp1 targeting interleukin‐1α in hidradenitis suppurativa ineligible for adalimumab treatment: results of the open‐label extension period

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 162-163
Author(s):  
T. Kanni ◽  
M. Argyropoulou ◽  
C. A. Dinarello ◽  
J. Simard ◽  
E. J. Giamarellos‐Bourboulis
Toxicon ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. S73-S74
Author(s):  
Christina Marciniak ◽  
Michael C. Munin ◽  
Allison Brashear ◽  
Bruce S. Rubin ◽  
Atul T. Patel ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (10) ◽  
pp. 3773-3782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetta Maria Bonora ◽  
Roberta Cappellari ◽  
Mattia Albiero ◽  
Angelo Avogaro ◽  
Gian Paolo Fadini

Abstract Context Reduction in the levels of circulating stem cells (CSCs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) predicts development or progression of microangiopathy and macroangiopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Objective We tested whether treatment with sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors affected the levels of CSCs and EPCs. Design A randomized trial of dapagliflozin vs placebo with open-label extension, and an open-label observational study of empagliflozin treatment. Setting Tertiary referral diabetes outpatient clinic. Patients Patients with T2D aged 18 to 75 years. Intervention Dapagliflozin at 10 mg vs placebo (n = 31); empagliflozin at 10 mg (n = 15). Main Outcome Measures We measured CSCs (CD34+) and EPCs (CD34+KDR+) by flow cytometry at baseline, at 12 weeks, and after the extension period. Results After 12 weeks, CSCs declined nonsignificantly in the dapagliflozin group, remained stable in the placebo group, and the change from baseline was not significantly different between the two groups. EPCs declined nonsignificantly in the dapagliflozin group, increased nonsignificantly in the placebo group, and the change from baseline was significantly different between the two groups. After an open-label extension period of about 1.5 years, CSCs remained stable over time, whereas EPCs significantly increased in patients who received dapagliflozin. In all patients, irrespectively of treatment, EPCs increased significantly from baseline to the end of observation, concomitantly with improvement in HbA1c. In a cohort of 15 patients who received open-label empagliflozin for 12 weeks, CSCs declined nonsignificantly, whereas EPCs remained stable. Conclusion SGLT2 inhibitors do not significantly increase CSCs or EPCs. Thus, cardiovascular protection by SGLT2 inhibitors may not directly involve stem/progenitor cells.


2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-69.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos C. Zouboulis ◽  
Martin M. Okun ◽  
Errol P. Prens ◽  
Robert Gniadecki ◽  
Peter A. Foley ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. s128
Author(s):  
Christos C Zouboulis ◽  
Martin M Okun ◽  
Robert Gniadecki ◽  
Peter A Foley ◽  
Charles Lynde ◽  
...  

Abstract Not AvailableDisclosures: Study supported by AbbVie.


2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (12) ◽  
pp. 1986-1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Emery ◽  
Jiří Vencovský ◽  
Anna Sylwestrzak ◽  
Piotr Leszczyński ◽  
Wieslawa Porawska ◽  
...  

ObjectivesSB4 (Benepali, Brenzys) is a biosimilar of reference etanercept (ETN). In a randomised, double-blind, 52-week study, SB4 demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to ETN in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The open-label extension period evaluated long-term efficacy, safety and immunogenicity when continuing SB4 versus switching from ETN to SB4.MethodsIn the randomised, double-blind phase, patients received weekly subcutaneous administration of 50 mg SB4 or ETN with background methotrexate for up to 52 weeks. Patients in the Czech Republic and Poland who completed the 52-week visit were enrolled in the open-label extension period and received SB4 for 48 additional weeks. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were assessed up to week 100.ResultsOf 245 patients entering the extension period, 126 continued to receive SB4 (SB4/SB4) and 119 switched to SB4 (ETN/SB4). American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates were sustained and comparable between SB4/SB4 and ETN/SB4 with ACR20 response rates at week 100 of 77.9% and 79.1%, respectively. Other efficacy results, including radiographic progression, were also comparable between the groups. After week 52, rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were 47.6% (SB4/SB4) and 48.7% (ETN/SB4); one patient/group developed non-neutralising antidrug antibodies. No cases of active tuberculosis or injection-site reactions were reported during the extension period. One patient (SB4/SB4) died of hepatic cancer.ConclusionsSB4 was effective and well tolerated over 2 years in patients with RA. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were comparable between the SB4/SB4 and ETN/SB4 groups, showing no risk associated with switching patients from ETN to SB4.Trial registration numberNCT01895309; 2012-005026-30


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document