Do short implants have similar survival rates compared to standard implants in posterior single crown?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 890-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Tolentino da Rosa de Souza ◽  
Milena Binhame Albini Martini ◽  
Luciana Reis Azevedo-Alanis
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Short Implants ◽  
Single Crown ◽  
Similar Survival

Influence of remaining axial walls on of root filled teeth restored with a single crown and adhesively bonded fibre post: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 103813
Author(s):  
E AlSaleh ◽  
A Dutta ◽  
P M H Dummer ◽  
D J J Farnell ◽  
M E Vianna
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adhesively Bonded ◽  
Single Crown

scholarly journals Long-term Short Implants Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Essential Assessment Parameters

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thais Marques Simek Vega Gonçalves ◽  
Sergio Bortolini ◽  
Matteo Martinolli ◽  
Bruna Fernandes Moreira Alfenas ◽  
Daiane Cristina Peruzzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Implant Failure ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Implant Survival Rate ◽  
Short Implants

<p>Lack of standard criteria in the outcome assessment makes it difficult to draw conclusions on the clinical performance of short implants and, under these circumstances, determine the reasons for implant failure. This study evaluated, through a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, the essential parameters required to assess the long-term clinical performance of short and extra-short implants. Electronic databases (Pubmed-MEDLINE, Cochrane Library Database, Embase, and Lilacs) were searched by two independent reviewers, without language limitation, to identify eligible papers. References from the selected articles were also reviewed. The review included clinical trials involving short dental implants placed in humans, published between January 2000 and March 2014, which described the parameters applied for outcome's measurements and provided data on survival rates. Thirteen methodologically acceptable studies were selected and 24 parameters were identified. The most frequent parameters assessed were the marginal bone loss and the cumulative implant survival rate, followed by implant failure rate and biological complications such as bleeding on probing and probing pocket depths. Only cumulative implant survival rate data allows meta-analysis revealing a positive effect size (from 0.052 (fixed) to 0.042 (random)), which means that short implant appears to be a successful treatment option. Mechanical complications and crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio measurement were also commonly described, however, considering the available evidence; no strong conclusions could be drawn since different methods were used to assess each parameter. By means of this literature review, a standard evaluation scheme is proposed, being helpful to regiment further investigations and comparisons on future studies.</p>

Failures in Single Extra-Short Implants (≤ 6 mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-689
Author(s):  
Maurício Badaró ◽  
Danny Marin ◽  
Patrícia Pauletto ◽  
Thais Gonçalves ◽  
André Porporatti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Short Implants

Short implants versus longer implants in the posterior alveolar region after an observation period of at least five years: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 103386
Author(s):  
Xinxin Xu ◽  
Jiao Huang ◽  
Xuewei Fu ◽  
Yunchun Kuang ◽  
Hui Yue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Alveolar Region ◽  
Short Implants ◽  
Observation Period

scholarly journals The survival rate of transcrestal sinus floor elevation combined with short implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhezhen Lin ◽  
Gege Wang ◽  
Fang Zhang ◽  
Yong Wang ◽  
Xue Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Short Implants ◽  
Sinus Floor

Short versus standard implants for single-crown restorations in the posterior region: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-538
Author(s):  
Xinxin Xu ◽  
Bo Hu ◽  
Yun Xu ◽  
Qin Liu ◽  
Huifen Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Posterior Region ◽  
Single Crown
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document