A comparison of patch testing with nickel sulfate in TRUE Test and in petrolatum at 2.5% and 5% concentrations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasmus Overgaard Bach ◽  
Mathias Tiedemann Svendsen ◽  
Kristian Fredløv Mose ◽  
Magnus Bruze ◽  
Cecilia Svedman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patch Testing ◽  
Nickel Sulfate

Patch testing with a dilution series of nickel sulfate

1992 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Szliska ◽  
E. Vocks ◽  
J. von Mayenburg ◽  
J. Rakoski
Keyword(s):  
Patch Testing ◽  
Nickel Sulfate ◽  
Dilution Series

Patch testing with nickel sulfate: comparison between 2 nickel sulfate preparations and 2 different test sites on the back

1998 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vlto Slmonetti ◽  
Blanca Maria Manzini ◽  
Stefania Seidenari
Keyword(s):  
Patch Testing ◽  
Nickel Sulfate

scholarly journals Patch Testing In Nepalese Population: A Single Center Study From Kathmandu, Nepal

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
Sushil Paudel ◽  
Guma Pun ◽  
Niraj Parajuli ◽  
Rabindra Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Patch Test ◽  
Patch Testing ◽  
Nickel Sulfate ◽  
Hand Eczema ◽  
Allergic Reactions ◽  
Positive Patch Test ◽  
Facial Eczema ◽  
Allergic Contact ◽  
Sensitization Pattern ◽  
Different Parts

Introduction: Patch testing is a diagnostic tool used in investigation to identify specific allergens in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). It helps find the prevalence and the trends of contact sensitization in the community. Objective: To report the two year patch test results from a central hospital in Kathmandu. Materials and Methods: Consecutive consenting patients of suspected ACD were patch tested with an Indian standard Series (Systopic) from June 2014 to August 2016. Results: Out of 141 patients tested, 89 were female (63.12%) and 52 were male (36.88%). Hand eczema was the commonest pattern (53 patients) followed by persistent and recurrent eczema (44 patients) and face eczema (25 patients). Fifty- five patients (39%) had at least 1 positive allergic reaction. Among these, 16.31% were male and 22.70% were female. The most common allergen was nickel sulfate (19.9%) followed by fragrance mix (7.8%) and paraphenyldiamine (PPD) (6.4%). Out of total positive cases 27 (21 females and 6 males) had shown strong positive reactions (++). The Nickel Sulfate was responsible in majority of cases (18/27 cases). Farmers had the highest (57.14%) rate of positive allergic reactions followed by housewives (39.62%). According to the regional eczema, patients with persistent and recurrent eczema of different parts of body had the highest rate of positive allergic reactions (47.72%). Almost half of patient with facial eczema (40%) had positive patch test. Conclusion: Larger studies are required in the different parts of the country to find a more accurate data regarding the sensitization pattern in Nepalese population.

Patch testing with nickel sulfate versus nickel chloride

1999 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 287-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Llisa Räsänen ◽  
Ulla Mattila ◽  
Klrsti Kalimo
Keyword(s):  
Patch Testing ◽  
Nickel Sulfate ◽  
Nickel Chloride

Comparative Study of IQ-Ultra and Finn Chambers Test Methodologies in Detecting 10 Common Standard Allergens that Cause Allergic Contact Dermatitis

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Doumit ◽  
Melanie Pratt
Keyword(s):  
Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Allergic Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Patch Testing ◽  
Potassium Dichromate ◽  
Nickel Sulfate ◽  
Formaldehyde Resin ◽  
Perfect Agreement ◽  
Patch Tests ◽  
The North ◽  
Allergic Contact

Background: Patch testing is routinely used in contact dermatitis clinics because it is the gold standard for the evaluation of potential allergic contact dermatitis. Objective: The study was undertaken to evaluate possible differences in reactivity between the Finn Chamber and IQ-Ultra patch-testing methodologies. Methods: Patients were patch-tested simultaneously with the Finn Chamber and IQ-Ultra patch tests. Ten standard allergens set by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group were used for both techniques. Results: Both patch tests had a significant agreement in detecting all of the allergens. An “almost perfect agreement” was noted for ethylenediamine dihydrochloride, quaternium-15, mercapto mix, black rubber mix, balsam of Peru, and nickel sulfate; “substantial agreement” for formaldehyde, bisphenol A epoxy resin, and 4-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin; and “moderate agreement” for potassium dichromate. Conclusion: The Finn Chamber and IQ-Ultra patch tests had a good agreement in the detection of the 10 standard allergens that were tested.

Burning Mouth Syndrome

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie B. Lynde ◽  
Miriam Grushka ◽  
Scott R.A. Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Patch Testing ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Contact Allergy ◽  
Nickel Sulfate ◽  
Burning Mouth Syndrome ◽  
Etiologic Factor ◽  
Dodecyl Gallate ◽  
Test Reactions ◽  
Burning Mouth ◽  
Positive Results

Background: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a burning or sore mouth in the absence of changes in the oral mucosa. It is often difficult to diagnose and treat. Numerous theories of the etiology have been suggested, including contact allergy. Objective: To determine the clinical utility of patch testing in patients with BMS. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients diagnosed with BMS who had patch testing performed between January 1, 2008, and July 31, 2012. Results: Of 142 consecutive patients with BMS, 132 consented to patch testing; 89 (67%) had allergic patch test reactions. Of the patients with positive results, 66 (74%) had results that were deemed to have possible relevance. The most common allergens detected were nickel sulfate 2.5%, dodecyl gallate 0.3%, octyl gallate 0.3%, fragrance mix 8%, benzoyl peroxide 1%, and cinnamic alcohol 1%. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that contact allergy may be an etiologic factor in some patients with BMS. Patch testing is a useful investigation for BMS patients.

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF PATCH TESTING IN CONTACT DERMATITIS PATIENTS ATTENDING TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN KARAIKAL

2021 ◽  
pp. 20-22
Author(s):  
SivaKumar Sivasubramaniam ◽  
Ambujam Govindasamy ◽  
Kode Leela Sravanthi ◽  
Brindha Pandiyan
Keyword(s):  
Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Patch Test ◽  
Patch Testing ◽  
Potassium Dichromate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Nickel Sulfate ◽  
Cobalt Sulfate ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Positive Patch Test ◽  
Contact Eczema

Introduction: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a growing concern due to increased use of cosmetics and topical medications routinely and exposure to a large number of allergens on day-to-day basis. Patch testing is a reliable method for detecting the causative antigens in suspected cases. Aims And Objectives: To assess the demographic profile, pattern of ACD, and patch test profile of suspected cases of ACD attending contact dermatitis clinic of our department. Materials And Methods: It was a prospective study in which all the patients with suspected ACD attending OPD of department of dermatology over a 3 month period were analysed. Patch testing was done using the most common antigens primarily, and other batteries were used depending on patient requirement and availability. Results: A total of 50 patients were enrolled in the contact dermatitis clinic over a period of 3 months. Hand eczema was the most common pattern seen in 23 cases followed by feet eczema, hand and foot eczema, facial eczema, forearm and leg eczema and photoallergic contact eczema. A total of 32 (64%) gave positive patch test results, with nickel sulfate being the most common allergen identified followed by cobalt sulfate & potassium dichromate. Conclusion: Common allergens identified in our study were more or less similar to studies from other parts of India

Patch testing with nickel sulfate in DMSO

1978 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. Van Ketel
Keyword(s):  
Patch Testing ◽  
Nickel Sulfate
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document