scholarly journals Comparative analysis of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Bowel Function Instrument and the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Questionnaire for assessment of bowel dysfunction in rectal cancer patients after low anterior resection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe F. Quezada‐Diaz ◽  
Hossam Elfeki ◽  
Katrine J. Emmertsen ◽  
Emmanouil P. Pappou ◽  
Rosa Jimenez‐Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Bowel Function ◽  
Bowel Dysfunction ◽  
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome ◽  
Anterior Resection Syndrome

scholarly journals Quality of Life and Bowel Dysfunction after Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Rectal Cancer: One Third of Patients Experience Major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten van Heinsbergen ◽  
Jeroen W. Leijtens ◽  
Gerrit D. Slooter ◽  
Maryska L. Janssen-Heijnen ◽  
Joop L. Konsten
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery ◽  
Bowel Dysfunction ◽  
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome ◽  
Anterior Resection Syndrome ◽  
Endoscopic Microsurgery

Background/Aims: The low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) severely affects quality of life (QoL) after rectal cancer surgery. Studies investigating LARS and the effect on QoL after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for rectal cancer are scarce. The aim of our study was to assess bowel dysfunction and QoL after TEM. Methods: Seventy-three ­patients who underwent TEM for stage I rectal cancer were included in this single-centre, cross-sectional study Bowel dysfunction was assessed by the LARS-Score, QoL by the ­European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and -CR29 questionnaires. Results: Fifty-five respondents (75.3%) could be included for the analyses. The median interval since treatment was 4.3 years, and the median age at the follow-up point was 72 years. “Major LARS” was observed in 29% of patients and “minor LARS” in 26%. Female gender (OR 4.00; 95% CI 1.20–13.36), neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (OR 3.63; 95% CI 1.08–12.17) and specimen thickness in millimetres (OR 1.10 for each mm increase in thickness; 95% CI 1.01–1.20) were associated with the development of major LARS. Patients with major LARS fared worse in most QoL domains. Conclusion: This is the first study demonstrating major LARS after TEM treatment for rectal cancer, with a negative effect on QoL, even years after treatment. Our data provides an adequate counselling before TEM in terms of postoperative bowel dysfunction and its effect on QoL.

The impact of timing of stoma closure on low anterior resection syndrome in patient who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 126-134
Author(s):  
Hemn Hussain Kaka Ali ◽  
Qalandar Hussein Abdulkarim ◽  
Karzan Seerwan ◽  
Barham M. M .Salih
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Anterior Resection ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Loop Ileostomy ◽  
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome ◽  
Anterior Resection Syndrome ◽  
Closure Of Ileostomy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact

This is a multi-center retrospective study of patients underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ileostomy had been done to protect low lying Colo-rectal anastomosis, closure of ileostomy had been delayed in some patients due to patient own will, surgical complications (anastomotic leak) or coarse of chemotherapy. This study aimed to find the effect of temporary ileostomy on post-operative bowel defunction which is called Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), and include; urgency, difficulty in emptying of bowel, and incontinence for feces and flatus.  A total of 50 patients included in this study, the age ranges from the 19 to 80 years old with a mean age of 51.96 years. The total number of males was (33, %66). Majority of patients were overweight (21, 42%). The distance of tumors from the anal verge were less than 10 cm in (31,62%). The mean duration of fecal diversion was 7.17 months. Loop ileostomy were closed before six months in (27,54%). The mean duration of diversion of patients developed no LARS was 6.87 months which is shorter than those of developed LARS (7.31). Lower BMI patients are more prone to develop LARS, while Obese patients are more susceptible to develop major LARS. Nineteen cases developed LARS among those patient’s ileostomy closed before six months, and 15 cases developed LARS in those ileostomies closed after six months.    

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document