Simple surgical method for clamping the rectum in robot‐assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery for rectal cancer – simple clamping technique – a video vignette

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Takeyama ◽  
Shingo Noura ◽  
Yozo Suzuki ◽  
Hiroshi Imamura ◽  
Naohiro Tomita ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianka Hummel ◽  
Anna Nagel ◽  
Benjamin Süsoy ◽  
Linda Tarantik ◽  
Linda Michlmayr ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1614-1618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Akiyoshi ◽  
Hiroya Kuroyanagi ◽  
Masatoshi Oya ◽  
Tsuyoshi Konishi ◽  
Meiki Fukuda ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siripong Sirikurnpiboon ◽  
Paiboon Jivapaisarnpong

Introduction. Single-access laparoscopic surgery (SALS) has been successfully introduced for colectomy surgery; however, for mid to low rectum procedures such as total mesorectal excision, it can be technically complicated. In this study, we introduced a single-access technique for rectum cancer operations without the use of other instruments.Aims. To show the short-term results of single-access laparoscopic rectal surgery in terms of pathologic results and immediate complications.Settings and Design. Prospective study.Materials and Methods. We selected middle rectum to anal canal cancer patients to undergo single-access laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer. All patients had total mesorectal excisions. An umbilical incision was made for the insertion of a single multichannel port, and a mesocolic window was created to identify the inferior mesenteric artery and vein. Total mesorectal excision was performed. There were no perioperative complications. The mean operative time was 269 minutes; the median hospital stay was 7 days; the mean wound size was 5.5 cm; the median number of harvested lymph nodes was 15; and all patients had intact mesorectal capsules.Statistical Analysis Used. Mean, minimum–maximum.Conclusion. Single-access laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is feasible while oncologic principles and patient safety are maintained.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Nozawa ◽  
Kazushige Kawai ◽  
Kazuhito Sasaki ◽  
Shigenobu Emoto ◽  
Koji Murono ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal cancer can cause inflammation, edema, and fibrosis formation in the surrounding tissue. Recently, we reported that preceding endoscopic treatment increased the volume of intraoperative blood loss and slightly prolonged the operative time of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. In this study, we addressed which factors, including endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)- related parameters, affect the difficulty of laparoscopic rectal surgery. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 24 consecutive patients who underwent ESD followed by laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in our hospital. Short-term surgical outcomes were evaluated by intraoperative blood loss and operative time for laparoscopic surgery. The correlations between the surgical outcomes and preoperative parameter were analyzed by scatter diagrams and multiple linear regression analyses. Results The patient cohort comprised 12 men and 12 women. The median distance between primary cancer and anal verge was 7 cm. The median procedure time of ESD was 120 minutes (21 available cases). The scatter diagram graph revealed a positive correlation between the ESD procedure time and estimated blood loss during rectal surgery (rs = 0.26). There was no association between the ESD procedure time and operative time for rectal surgery. Based on multiple linear regression analyses, the ESD procedure time (p = 0.007) and tumor location from the anal verge (p = 0.046) were independently predictive of intraoperative blood loss. On the other hand, only tumor location was found an independent predictor of surgical time (p = 0.014). Conclusions A long session of ESD for rectal cancer may make subsequent laparoscopic surgery difficult based on intraoperative blood loss.


2021 ◽  
Vol 105 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 528-532
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Nozawa ◽  
Kazushige Kawai ◽  
Kazuhito Sasaki ◽  
Shigenobu Emoto ◽  
Koji Murono ◽  
...  

Objetive:  In this study, we addressed which factors, including endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)–related parameters, affect the difficulty of laparoscopic rectal surgery. Summary of background data:  Endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal cancer can cause inflammation, edema, and fibrosis formation in the surrounding tissue. Recently, we reported that preceding endoscopic treatment increased the volume of intraoperative blood loss and slightly prolonged the operative time of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Methods:  We retrospectively reviewed 24 consecutive patients who underwent ESD followed by laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in our hospital. Short-term surgical outcomes were evaluated by intraoperative blood loss and operative time for laparoscopic surgery. The correlations between the surgical outcomes and preoperative parameter were analyzed by multiple linear regression analyses. Results:  The patient cohort comprised 12 men and 12 women. The median distance between primary cancer and anal verge was 7 cm. The median procedure time of ESD was 120 minutes (21 available cases). Based on multiple linear regression analyses, the ESD procedure time (P = 0.007) and tumor location from the anal verge (P = 0.046) were independently predictive of intraoperative blood loss. On the other hand, only tumor location was found to be an independent predictor of surgical time (P = 0.014). Conclusions:  A long session of ESD for rectal cancer may make subsequent laparoscopic surgery difficult based on intraoperative blood loss.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Fukunaga ◽  
Masayuki Higashino ◽  
Shinnya Tanimura ◽  
Masashi Takemura ◽  
Yushi Fujiwara

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document