scholarly journals Difficulties in auditory organization as a cause of reading backwardness? An auditory neuroscience perspective

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. e12457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Leong ◽  
Usha Goswami
10.2741/2666 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valter Ciocca

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Benson Wong ◽  
J Gerard G Borst

The dorsal (DCIC) and lateral cortices (LCIC) of the inferior colliculus are major targets of the auditory and non-auditory cortical areas, suggesting a role in complex multimodal information processing. However, relatively little is known about their functional organization. We utilized in vivo two-photon Ca2+ imaging in awake mice expressing GCaMP6s in GABAergic or non-GABAergic neurons in the IC to investigate their spatial organization. We found different classes of temporal responses, which we confirmed with simultaneous juxtacellular electrophysiology. Both GABAergic and non-GABAergic neurons showed spatial microheterogeneity in their temporal responses. In contrast, a robust, double rostromedial-caudolateral gradient of frequency tuning was conserved between the two groups, and even among the subclasses. This, together with the existence of a subset of neurons sensitive to spontaneous movements, provides functional evidence for redefining the border between DCIC and LCIC.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily B. J. Coffey ◽  
Trent Nicol ◽  
Travis White-Schwoch ◽  
Bharath Chandrasekaran ◽  
Jennifer Krizman ◽  
...  

Abstract The auditory frequency-following response (FFR) is a non-invasive index of the fidelity of sound encoding in the brain, and is used to study the integrity, plasticity, and behavioral relevance of the neural encoding of sound. In this Perspective, we review recent evidence suggesting that, in humans, the FFR arises from multiple cortical and subcortical sources, not just subcortically as previously believed, and we illustrate how the FFR to complex sounds can enhance the wider field of auditory neuroscience. Far from being of use only to study basic auditory processes, the FFR is an uncommonly multifaceted response yielding a wealth of information, with much yet to be tapped.


2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elyse S. Sussman ◽  
Mitchell Steinschneider

2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur N. Popper ◽  
John Ramcharitar ◽  
Steven E. Campana

Otoliths are of interest to investigators from several disciplines including systematics, auditory neuroscience, and fisheries. However, there is often very little sharing of information or ideas about otoliths across disciplines despite similarities in the questions raised by different groups of investigators. A major purpose of this paper is to present otolith-related questions common to all disciplines and then demonstrate that the issues are not only similar but also that more frequent interactions would be mutually beneficial. Because otoliths evolved as part of the inner ear to serve the senses of balance and hearing, we first discuss the basic structure of the ear. We then raise several questions that deal with the structure and patterns of otolith morphology and how changes in otoliths with fish age affect hearing and balance. More specifically, we ask about the significance of otolith size and how this might affect ear function; the growth of otoliths and how hearing and balance may or may not change with growth; the significance of different otolith shapes with respect to ear function; the functional significance of otoliths that do not contact the complete sensory epithelium; and why teleost fishes have otoliths and not the otoconia found in virtually all other extant vertebrates.


1989 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert S. Bregman ◽  
Yves Tougas

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. R91-R93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah A Hall ◽  
David R Moore

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document