scholarly journals Managing Ethical Challenges to Mental Health Research in Post-Conflict Settings

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Chiumento ◽  
Muhammad Naseem Khan ◽  
Atif Rahman ◽  
Lucy Frith
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 42-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria D. Eldridge ◽  
Mark E. Johnson ◽  
Christiane Brems ◽  
Staci L. Corey

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sapfo Lignou ◽  
John Geddes ◽  
Ilina Singh

Advancements in mental health research, social changes and policy developments have led to the emergence of new forms of research partnerships, which bring together research institutions, public companies and lay people as partners in the same research project. In this paper, we argue that partnerships comprised of industry, academia and people with experience of mental illness may present practical and ethical challenges that affect the conduct of research and undermine public trust in research collaborations. We outline a number of ethical problems from the motivation to combine competing interests and values of these diverse research partners. We argue that while critical perspectives on each of the partnership forms outlined above exist in the literature, the combination of industry, research and PPI actors in partnership in mental health research has not received sufficient scrutiny. We suggest that a robust ethical approach is needed to properly substantiate the value of such research partnerships, to inform practical and ethical guidance on potential conflicts and to facilitate productive collaborative research.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
Pratik Khanal ◽  
Sajana Maharjan

People with mental health problems are considered as vulnerable population by national ethical guidelines of health research in Nepal. There are different ethical challenges in research involving people with mental health problems. Ethical challenges are related to study design, autonomy, beneficence and nonmaleficence, justice, respect for the environment and consent taking process. Respecting the human rights of those with mental health problems is necessary during research and this requires research stakeholders to be responsible.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-123
Author(s):  
Margaret Walkover

This reflection comments on Type III error—how the misrecognition of causal factors shaping the onset, acuity, and duration of mental health symptoms may lead to the design of interventions that compromise the health of populations. Type III error reveals the ethical challenges of research designs that answer the wrong question. The argument offered by Schwartz and Carpenter in their 1999 article, “The right answer for the wrong question: consequences of Type III error for public health research,” is used as a foil to discuss ethical implications for population mental health.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elvira Perez Vallejos ◽  
Ansgar Koene ◽  
Christopher James Carter ◽  
Daniel Hunt ◽  
Christopher Woodard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document