scholarly journals Quantitation of valve regurgitation severity by three-dimensional vena contracta area is superior to flow convergence method of quantitation on transesophageal echocardiography

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 992-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muaz M. Abudiab ◽  
Chieh-Ju Chao ◽  
Shuang Liu ◽  
Tasneem Z. Naqvi
2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 793-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dasan E. Velayudhan ◽  
Todd M. Brown ◽  
Navin C. Nanda ◽  
Vinod Patel ◽  
Andrew P. Miller ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-190
Author(s):  
Francisco López-Pardo ◽  
Antonio González-Calle ◽  
José López-Haldón ◽  
Juan Acosta-Martínez ◽  
Diego Rangel-Sousa ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Mehrnoush Toufan ◽  
Dina Ashouri

Dear Editor, Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography is a powerful tool for assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR) [1]. However, it bears several major disadvantages. Evidence suggests that measurement of the vena contracta area (VCA) via a three-dimensional (3D) method is significantly more accurate than 2D methods in the quantification of MR since the 2D method is not sufficiently reliable in calculation of VC diameter because of  circular assumption of VC area [2]. VCA direct planimetry (DP) and multiplanar reconstruction (MPR)-derived VCA are direct and reliable methods to quantify MR severity, and their results are comparable with those of 2D integrative method [2, 3]. It is strongly recommended that these methods especially DP can replace 2D methods in the quantification of MR in the clinical practice, as it is more accurate and easy to perform [3].


2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 695-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen H. Little ◽  
Bahar Pirat ◽  
Rahul Kumar ◽  
Stephen R. Igo ◽  
Marti McCulloch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document