The Correlation between Three-Dimensional Vena Contracta Area and Aortic Regurgitation Index in Patients with Aortic Regurgitation

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Hui Chin ◽  
Chung-Huo Chen ◽  
Hung-Shun Lo
2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 775-781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ligang Fang ◽  
Ming Chon Hsiung ◽  
Andrew P. Miller ◽  
Navin C. Nanda ◽  
Wei Hsian Yin ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 793-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dasan E. Velayudhan ◽  
Todd M. Brown ◽  
Navin C. Nanda ◽  
Vinod Patel ◽  
Andrew P. Miller ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 99 (12) ◽  
pp. 1611-1617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Mori ◽  
Takahiro Shiota ◽  
Michael Jones ◽  
Suthep Wanitkun ◽  
Timothy Irvine ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Mehrnoush Toufan ◽  
Dina Ashouri

Dear Editor, Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography is a powerful tool for assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR) [1]. However, it bears several major disadvantages. Evidence suggests that measurement of the vena contracta area (VCA) via a three-dimensional (3D) method is significantly more accurate than 2D methods in the quantification of MR since the 2D method is not sufficiently reliable in calculation of VC diameter because of  circular assumption of VC area [2]. VCA direct planimetry (DP) and multiplanar reconstruction (MPR)-derived VCA are direct and reliable methods to quantify MR severity, and their results are comparable with those of 2D integrative method [2, 3]. It is strongly recommended that these methods especially DP can replace 2D methods in the quantification of MR in the clinical practice, as it is more accurate and easy to perform [3].


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document