Multimodality imaging of left ventricular apical pseudoaneurysm after apical approach transcatheter aortic valve replacement

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1509-1511
Author(s):  
Kianoush Ansari‐Gilani ◽  
Basar Sareyyupoglu
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Multimodality Imaging ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

scholarly journals Multimodality imaging derived energy loss index and outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 1092-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik W Holy ◽  
Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim ◽  
Lisa Hoffelner ◽  
Daniel Stocker ◽  
Thomas Stadler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Energy Loss ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Multimodality Imaging ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Loss Index

Abstract Aims  To assess whether the combination of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) data affects the grading of aortic stenosis (AS) severity under consideration of the energy loss index (ELI) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods and results  Multimodality imaging was performed in 197 patients with symptomatic severe AS undergoing TAVR at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland. Fusion aortic valve area index (fusion AVAi) assessed by integrating MDCT derived planimetric left ventricular outflow tract area into the continuity equation was significantly larger as compared to conventional AVAi (0.41 ± 0.1 vs. 0.51 ± 0.1 cm2/m2; P < 0.01). A total of 62 patients (31.4%) were reclassified from severe to moderate AS with fusion AVAi being >0.6 cm2/m2. ELI was obtained for conventional AVAi and fusion AVAi based on sinotubular junction area determined by TTE (ELILTL 0.47 ± 0.1 cm2/m2; fusion ELILTL 0.60 ± 0.1 cm2/m2) and MDCT (ELIMDCT 0.48 ± 0.1 cm2/m2; fusion ELIMDCT 0.61 ± 0.05 cm2/m2). When ELI was calculated with fusion AVAi the effective orifice area was >0.6 cm2/m2 in 85 patients (43.1%). Survival rate 3 years after TAVR was higher in patients reclassified to moderate AS according to multimodality imaging derived ELI (78.8% vs. 67%; P = 0.01). Conclusion  Multimodality imaging derived ELI reclassifies AS severity in 43% undergoing TAVR and predicts mid-term outcome.

scholarly journals More in, better out? Successful valve-in-valve procedure of an iatrogenic ventricular septal defect following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus-Dieter Hönemann ◽  
Steffen Hofmann ◽  
Frank Ritter ◽  
Gerold Mönnig
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Ventricular Septal Defect ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Septal Defect ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Heart Team ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Valve In Valve

Abstract Background A rare, but serious, complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the occurrence of an iatrogenic ventricular septal defect (VSD). Case summary We describe a case of an 80-year-old female who was referred with severe aortic stenosis for TAVR. Following thorough evaluation, the heart team consensus was to proceed with implantation via a transapical approach of an ACURATE neo M 25 mm valve (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). The valve was deployed harnessing transoesophageal echocardiographic (TOE) guidance under rapid pacing with post-dilation. Directly afterwards a very high VSD close to the aortic annulus was detected. As the patient was haemodynamically stable, the procedure was ended. The next day another TOE revealed a shunt volume (left-to-right ventricle) between 50% and 60%. Because the defect was partly located between the stent struts of the ACURATE valve decision was made to fix this leakage with implantation of a further valve and we chose an EVOLUT Pro 29 mm (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The valve-in-valve was implanted 2–3 mm below the lower edge of the first valve, more towards the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) with excellent result: VSD was reduced to a very small residual shunt without any hemodynamic relevance. Discussion We suggest that an iatrogenic VSD located near the annulus may be treated percutaneously in a bail-out situation with implantation of a second valve that should be implanted slightly more into the LVOT to cover the VSD.

Abstract 16138: Validation of a Non-invasive Approach for the Assessment of Left Ventricular-arterial Coupling Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad Mogadam ◽  
David Shavelle ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Gregory Giesler ◽  
Ray Matthews ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Aortic Pressure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Arterial Elastance ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established treatment for patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Ventriculoarterial (LV-arterial) coupling defined as the ratio of total arterial elastance (Ea) to left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees) reflects effective cardiac energetics and is a well-accepted index for quantification of LV-arterial coupling. Despite its usefulness, estimating Ees/Ea has technical difficulties. Intrinsic Frequency (IF) method is a noninvasive and single waveform system-based approach for quantification of LV-arterial coupling. The objective of this study was to compare IF variables with Ea/Ees in predicting optimum LV-arterial energetics following TAVR. Method: Twenty-eight patients with severe AS, undergoing TAVR were included. Mean age was 85±4, 53% male with mean ejection fraction 59±6.4. IFs during systole (ω1), diastole (ω2), and total IF variation (Δω=ω1-ω2) were computed from the ascending aortic pressure waveforms at baseline and following TAVR. Ea/Ees was computed using single-beat technique proposed by Takeuchi et al. ( Circulation . 1991;83(1):202-212). Results: There was a significant decrease in Ea/Ees (p<0.001) toward optimum coupling immediately after TAVR (Figure 1a). There was a statistically significant correlation between Ea/Ees and Δω (r= 0.68, p<0.01) (Figure 1b). Conclusion: IF appears to be an accurate and reliable index for quantification of LV-arterial coupling given significant concordance with Ea/Ees. The management of patients with acutely altered hemodynamic states post TAVR can benefit from the assessment of LV-arterial coupling. Since IFs can be measured noninvasively using hand-held devices (e.g. an iPhone), this approach should broaden the clinical applicability of this useful parameter for assessing systolic function, therapeutic response and ventricular-arterial interaction post TAVR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document