scholarly journals Invasive plants differentially affect soil biota through litter and rhizosphere pathways: a meta‐analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 200-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei Zhang ◽  
Bo Li ◽  
Jihua Wu ◽  
Shuijin Hu
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nardi Torres ◽  
Ileana Herrera ◽  
Laurie Fajardo ◽  
Ramiro O. Bustamante

Abstract Background One of the ecological impacts of exotic plant invasions may be alteration of the soil microbial community, which may cause changes to the diversity, richness and function of these communities. In order to explore to what extent invasive plants affect the soil microbial community, we performed a meta-analysis based on 46 scientific articles to document the effect of invasive plants on species richness and diversity of bacteria and fungi. We conducted our study across a range of invaded ecosystems including native communities, and evaluated biomass, richness and diversity. We use a random effects model to determine the increase or decrease in the values of the response variables in the presence of invasive plants. Results The results indicated that the response variable that changed with the invasion of plants was the diversity of bacteria. Bacterial diversity in the soil increases with the presence of invasive plants, specifically herbaceous plants producing allelopathic substances growing in forest ecosystems of temperate zones. Conclusions We provide evidence that invasive plants affect the soil biota differentially; however, it is important to consider more variables such as the N and C cycles, since these processes are mediated by soil biota and litter, and chemical compounds released by plants influence them. Changes in bacterial diversity have consequences for the nutrient cycle, enzymatic activity, mineralization rates and soil carbon and nitrogen content.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Derek Scasta ◽  
David M. Engle ◽  
Samuel D. Fuhlendorf ◽  
Daren D. Redfearn ◽  
Terrance G. Bidwell

AbstractIntroducing exotic forages in the attempt to enhance livestock and wildlife forage has been practiced widely for over a century. These forage species are selected for traits conferring persistence under stress, potentially yielding invaders that transform native plant communities. Using standardized systematic review guidelines and meta-analytical techniques we quantified effects of exotic forage invasion on change of native plant community structure, and compared the magnitude and direction of change across exotic forage species, plant functional groups, and structure of plant communities. Our study of 13 exotic forage species in North America (six C4 grasses, three C3 grasses, and four legumes) yielded 35 papers with quantitative data from 64 case studies. Nine of the 13 species met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The overall effect of exotic forage invasion on native plant communities was negative (Ē̄ = −0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.29 to −0.25). The effect size was most negative for two C4 grasses, Lehmann lovegrass and Old World bluestems. A negative effect was also expressed by C3 and C4 grass functional groups, and these effects were stronger than for legumes. Effect size differed among measures of plant community structure, with the greatest negative effect on native plant biomass and the least negative effect on species evenness. Weighted fail-safe numbers indicated publication bias was not an issue. Exotic forage species are important for agricultural production but may threaten complex multi-functioning landscapes and should be considered as a subset of potentially invasive exotic species. Characteristics making exotic forages different from other exotic plants hinge on pathways of selection and dispersion: selection is based on persistence mechanisms similar to characteristics of invasive plants; dispersion by humans is intentional across expansive geographic regions. Exotic forages present a complex socio-ecological problem exacerbated by disconnected scientific disciplines, competing interests between policy and science, and organized efforts to increase food production.


2013 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Maron ◽  
John Klironomos ◽  
Lauren Waller ◽  
Ragan M. Callaway

2022 ◽  
Vol 230 ◽  
pp. 113150
Author(s):  
Hui Wei ◽  
Lizhu Wu ◽  
Ziqiang Liu ◽  
Muhammad Saleem ◽  
Xuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 170 (3) ◽  
pp. 445-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt O. Reinhart ◽  
Ragan M. Callaway
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. McCary ◽  
Robin Mores ◽  
Monica A. Farfan ◽  
David H. Wise

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document