Chemosensory discrimination of male age by female Psammodromus algirus lizards based on femoral secretions and feces

Ethology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 125 (11) ◽  
pp. 802-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Nisa Ramiro ◽  
Gonzalo Rodríguez‐Ruiz ◽  
Pílar López ◽  
Pedro Ismael da Silva Junior ◽  
Miguel Trefaut Rodrigues ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Till ◽  
Jonathon Weakley ◽  
Dale B. Read ◽  
Padraic Phibbs ◽  
Josh Darrall-Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  


2021 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 103349
Author(s):  
N.A. du Fossé ◽  
E.E.L.O. Lashley ◽  
E. van Beelen ◽  
T. Meuleman ◽  
S. le Cessie ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oladele A. Oluwayiose ◽  
Haotian Wu ◽  
Hachem Saddiki ◽  
Brian W. Whitcomb ◽  
Laura B. Balzer ◽  
...  

AbstractParental age at time of offspring conception is increasing in developed countries. Advanced male age is associated with decreased reproductive success and increased risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in offspring. Mechanisms for these male age effects remain unclear, but changes in sperm DNA methylation over time is one potential explanation. We assessed genome-wide methylation of sperm DNA from 47 semen samples collected from male participants of couples seeking infertility treatment. We report that higher male age was associated with lower likelihood of fertilization and live birth, and poor embryo development (p < 0.05). Furthermore, our multivariable linear models showed male age was associated with alterations in sperm methylation at 1698 CpGs and 1146 regions (q < 0.05), which were associated with > 750 genes enriched in embryonic development, behavior and neurodevelopment among others. High dimensional mediation analyses identified four genes (DEFB126, TPI1P3, PLCH2 and DLGAP2) with age-related sperm differential methylation that accounted for 64% (95% CI 0.42–0.86%; p < 0.05) of the effect of male age on lower fertilization rate. Our findings from this modest IVF population provide evidence for sperm methylation as a mechanism of age-induced poor reproductive outcomes and identifies possible candidate genes for mediating these effects.



Author(s):  
Senda Reguera ◽  
Francisco J. Zamora-Camacho ◽  
Cristina E. Trenzado ◽  
Ana Sanz ◽  
Gregorio Moreno-Rueda


2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 480-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Mirhosseini ◽  
J.P. Michaud ◽  
M.A. Jalali ◽  
M. Ziaaddini

AbstractComponents of male seminal fluids are known to stimulate fecundity and fertility in females of numerous insect species and paternal effects on offspring phenotype are also known, but no studies have yet demonstrated links between male effects on female reproduction and those on progeny phenotype. In separate laboratory experiments employing 10-day-old virgin females ofCheilomenes sexmaculata(F.), we varied male age and mating history to manipulate levels of male allomones and found that the magnitude of paternal effects on progeny phenotype was correlated with stimulation of female reproduction. Older virgin males remained in copula longer than younger ones, induced higher levels of female fecundity, and sired progeny that developed faster to yield heavier adults. When male age was held constant (13 days), egg fertility declined as a function of previous male copulations, progeny developmental times increased, and the adult weight of daughters declined. These results suggest that male epigenetic effects on progeny phenotype act in concert with female reproductive stimulation; both categories of effects increased as a consequence of male celibacy (factor accumulation), and diminished as a function of previous matings (factor depletion). Male factors that influence female reproduction are implicated in sexual conflict and parental effects may extend this conflict to offspring phenotype. Whereas mothers control the timing of oviposition events and can use maternal effects to tailor progeny phenotypes to prevailing or anticipated conditions, fathers cannot. Since females remate and dilute paternity in polyandrous systems, paternal fitness will be increased by linking paternal effects to female fecundity stimulation, so that more benefits accrue to the male's own progeny.





2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 539-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Gabirot ◽  
Pilar López ◽  
José Martín ◽  
Michelle de Fraipont ◽  
Benoit Heulin ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document