Effectiveness of Kinesiotaping in Pregnant Women with Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study

Author(s):  
Banu Ordahan ◽  
Jule Eriç Horasanlı
Author(s):  
banu ordahan ◽  
Jule Eriç Horasanlı

Aim Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is an especially common cause of pain during pregnancy. Treatment options during pregnancy are very limited in order to reduce pain and increase the quality of life. We aimed to determine the efficacy of kinesiotaping (KT) in the treatment of sacroiliac joint pain in pregnant women. Methods A total of 50 pregnant women with sacroiliac joint pain were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups as KT and sham KT groups. Women in the KT group underwent a total of five weeks of KT once per week; the sham KT group also underwent five weeks of KT applications, but without tension in the kinesiotape. Patients were assessed before and five weeks after the treatment with a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ) for disability and quality of life. Results The KT and sham KT groups were similar in terms of age, parity, gravidas, gestational week, and body mass index. At the beginning of the study, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in their VAS, RMDQ, or PGQ scores. Five weeks later, the KT group showed significant improvement in all parameters, but no significant differences were observed for the sham KT group in terms of VAS, RMDQ, or PGQ. Conclusions KT treatment improved the pain levels, functioning, and quality of life among pregnant women with sacroiliac joint pain. Keywords Sacroiliac joint pain; Pregnancy; Kinesiotaping


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (03) ◽  
pp. 322-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Johnson ◽  
Bob Wong ◽  
Nancy Rose ◽  
Gwen Latendresse ◽  
Roger Altizer ◽  
...  

Purpose This project developed and evaluated the efficacy of a game decision aid among pregnant women about prenatal screening in a randomized controlled study. Study Design Participants were recruited from an obstetric clinic of an academic urban medical center and randomized (n = 73) to one of two study groups: the control group (n = 39) that used a brochure or the intervention group (n = 34) that also used a game decision aid. Result Participants who played the game had higher knowledge scores (m = 21.41, standard deviation [SD] = 1.74) than participants in the control group (m = 19.59; SD = 3.31), p = 0.004. The median time of game playing was 6:43 minutes (range: 2:17–16:44). The groups were similar in frequency of completing screening after the study, control = 6 (15%) versus intervention = 11 (32%), p = 0.087. However, the more interaction with the game resulted in more positive attitudes toward screening. Conclusion The addition of a game decision aid was effective in educating pregnant women about prenatal screening. As other genetic testing decisions continue to increase within clinical care, game-based decision tools may be a constructive method of informed decision-making.


2008 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P. Cohen ◽  
Robert W. Hurley ◽  
Chester C. Buckenmaier ◽  
Connie Kurihara ◽  
Benny Morlando ◽  
...  

Background Sacroiliac joint pain is a challenging condition accounting for approximately 20% of cases of chronic low back pain. Currently, there are no effective long-term treatment options for sacroiliac joint pain. Methods A randomized placebo-controlled study was conducted in 28 patients with injection-diagnosed sacroiliac joint pain. Fourteen patients received L4-L5 primary dorsal rami and S1-S3 lateral branch radiofrequency denervation using cooling-probe technology after a local anesthetic block, and 14 patients received the local anesthetic block followed by placebo denervation. Patients who did not respond to placebo injections crossed over and were treated with radiofrequency denervation using conventional technology. Results One, 3, and 6 months after the procedure, 11 (79%), 9 (64%), and 8 (57%) radiofrequency-treated patients experienced pain relief of 50% or greater and significant functional improvement. In contrast, only 2 patients (14%) in the placebo group experienced significant improvement at their 1-month follow-up, and none experienced benefit 3 months after the procedure. In the crossover group (n = 11), 7 (64%), 6 (55%), and 4 (36%) experienced improvement 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure. One year after treatment, only 2 patients (14%) in the treatment group continued to demonstrate persistent pain relief. Conclusions These results provide preliminary evidence that L4 and L5 primary dorsal rami and S1-S3 lateral branch radiofrequency denervation may provide intermediate-term pain relief and functional benefit in selected patients with suspected sacroiliac joint pain. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and to determine the optimal candidates and treatment parameters for this poorly understood disorder.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (21;1) ◽  
pp. 607-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Mehta

Background: Radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) is a therapy aimed at providing lasting back pain relief for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. A recent advancement in RFN is a strip lesioning technique that involves placement of a single curved electrode and a 3-pole design that facilitates the creation of 5 overlapping lesions. These lesions form one long strip lesion accessible through a single entry point, without the need for multiple punctures. Although the early case series data looks promising, there is lack of long-term, randomized, controlled study evaluating the strip-lesioning system for SIJ pain. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and effectiveness of RFN using a strip lesioning device for reduction of SIJ pain. Study Design: Prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial with 6-month follow-up Setting: A tertiary care interventional pain management center in the UK Methods: Patients with SIJ pain with positive diagnostic local anesthetic blocks were randomly assigned (2:1) to either the sham (no RF lesions performed) or the active group (RF lesions performed). The primary endpoint was improvement of pain using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) at 3 months. Results were analyzed using nonparametric tests. Safety, secondary, and long-term outcome data were also collected. Results: Seventeen of 30 enrolled patients were randomly assigned to active treatment (n = 11) or sham treatment (n = 6). At 3 months, the mean NRS-11 score for the active group had decreased significantly, from 8.1 (± 0.8) at baseline to 3.4 (± 2.0) (P < 0.001). The sham group did not experience a statistically or clinically meaningful decrease in mean NRS-11 score from baseline (7.3 ± 0.8) to 3 months (7.0 ± 1.7). On average, patients in the active group moved from borderline anxiety at baseline (9.4 ± 5.9) to no anxiety (6.6 ± 6.3) at 3 months. Results were similar at 6 months. Limitations: Recruitment was stopped at 30 enrolled patients, only 17 of whom were randomly assigned to active or sham treatment, after the interim analysis indicated a statistically significant (P < 0.001) difference in the pain outcome between the treatment and the sham groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that radiofrequency neurotomy using a strip lesioning device is an appropriate therapy to treat SIJ pain. Key words: Radiofrequency, sacroiliac joint pain, low back pain, neurotomy, randomized controlled trial, simplicity


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document