Shame and social work: Theory, reflexivity and practice. VeronikaMagyar‐HaasHolgerSchoneville Edited by LizFrost, AlessandroSicora, 2020. Bristol: Policy Press, 200 pp., PB. ISBN 978‐1447344087.

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-129
Author(s):  
Graham Scambler
Author(s):  
Catherine Forde ◽  
Deborah Lynch

10.18060/133 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie D. Decker ◽  
Philip D. Suman ◽  
Barb J. Burge ◽  
Ankita Deka ◽  
Melanie Harris ◽  
...  

The authors reviewed 67 articles that discussed and/or tested human behavior theories from social work journals published in 2004 in order to assess the level and quality of theory progression. The articles were further sorted into Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS) Foundation Curriculum content areas of HBSE, practice, policy, field education, values & ethics, diversity, populations-at-risk/social and economic justice, and research for purposes of categorization. Results indicated that HBSE and practice were by far the largest group of articles reviewed.Also found was that social work has a limited amount of theory discussion in the content areas of field, values and ethics, diversity, and populations-at-risk/social and economic justice. Thirty-three articles were found to demonstrate theory progression, eight articles presented new/emerging theories, and 26 articles discussed or critiqued theories without presenting evidence of theory progression.


Author(s):  
Liz Frost

Against the background of the multifaceted and various interpretations and definitions of the concept of shame in sociological, psychological, and philosophical literature, Liz Frost, author of this chapter, proposes a systematic classification at which level shame could be considered. This three-part taxonomy she developed in reference to Honneth’s theory of recognition with the expectation of generating an analytical tool for social work theory, reflection, and practice. Three levels are taken into account: political/national, group/social and individual/personal. In each category it will consider how and by whom this type of shame might be generated, some key ideas or arguments within its purview, and some effects and/or practices that it leads to. The importance of the proposed taxonomy is illustrated and clarified on the basis of the phenomenon of ageism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document