Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors

2005 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 456-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragnhild Cnattingius ◽  
Berit Höglund ◽  
Helle Kieler
2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-93
Author(s):  
P. Foumane ◽  
V. Mve Koh ◽  
J. Ze Minkande ◽  
E.A. Njofang Ngantcha ◽  
J.S. Dohbit ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corine J. Verhoeven ◽  
Cedric T. van Uytrecht ◽  
Martina M. Porath ◽  
Ben Willem J. Mol

Objective. To identify potential risk factors for cesarean delivery following labor induction in multiparous women at term.Methods. We conducted a retrospective case-control study. Cases were parous women in whom the induction of labor had resulted in a cesarean delivery. For each case, we used the data of two successful inductions as controls. Successful induction was defined as a vaginal delivery after the induction of labor. The study was limited to term singleton pregnancies with a child in cephalic position.Results. Between 1995 and 2010, labor was induced in 2548 parous women, of whom 80 had a cesarean delivery (3%). These 80 cases were compared to the data of 160 parous women with a successful induction of labor. In the multivariate analysis history of preterm delivery (odds ratio (OR) 5.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 25)), maternal height (OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.95)) and dilatation at the start of induction (OR 0.43 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.98)) were associated with failed induction.Conclusion. In multiparous women, the risk of cesarean delivery following labor induction increases with previous preterm delivery, short maternal height, and limited dilatation at the start of induction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
pp. 542-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Paidas Teefey ◽  
Liberty Reforma ◽  
Nathanael C. Koelper ◽  
Mary D. Sammel ◽  
Sindhu K. Srinivas ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 1747-1751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Nakano ◽  
Haruka Muto ◽  
Keisuke Ishii ◽  
Shusaku Hayashi ◽  
Yoko Okamoto ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hailu Aragie ◽  
Mohammed Oumer

Abstract Background Umbilical cord may insert abnormally i.e. marginal insertion to a placenta which can cause different birth and perinatal complications. Despite the increased effort taken by different responsible bodies, the prevalence of birth and perinatal complications are still high, possibly due to anomalous cord insertion. So far, anomalous cord insertion lacks proper attention in different medical settings. Hence, the present study aims to assess the magnitude, risk factors, and adverse birth outcomes of marginal cord insertion among singleton births. Methods An institution-based cross-sectional study design was conducted. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select study participants. Data were collected by using a structured questionnaire and it was entered into epi-data version 3.1 then exported to SPSS version 20 for data cleansing and analysis. Bi-variable and multivariable logistic regressions were employed to identify risk factors and adverse outcomes associated with marginal cord insertions. Crude and adjusted odds ratio (P-value < 0.05) with a 95% confidence interval were calculated. Result The magnitude of marginal cord insertion was 6.4% (95% CI = 4.4–8.8%) in singleton pregnancies. Independent risk factors for marginal cord insertion were advanced maternal age (AOR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.35–11.08), primiparity (AOR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.37–8.69), maternal chronic hypertension (AOR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.66–9.76), previous cesarean delivery (AOR = 2.51, 95% CI: 1.43–10.21), and use of intrauterine contraceptive device before pregnancy (AOR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.36–12.30). Pregnancies complicated by marginal cord insertion are at higher risk to develop low birth weight (AOR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.23–6.80), preterm birth (AOR = 4.00, 95% CI: 1.44–11.14), and emergency cesarean delivery (AOR = 3.68, 95% CI: 1.03–13.81). Conclusion and recommendation Marginal cord insertion is a mistreated potential risk for low birth weight, preterm birth, and emergency cesarean delivery. Routine screening of marginal cord insertion should be considered in pregnancies with advanced age, nulliparity, hypertensive disorder, history of cesarean section, and intrauterine contraceptive device usage before pregnancy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 218 (1) ◽  
pp. S251
Author(s):  
Christina P. Teefey ◽  
Liberty Reforma ◽  
Lisa D. Levine ◽  
Sindhu K. Srinivas ◽  
Celeste P. Durnwald

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document