scholarly journals SEXUALLY ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION IN A MATING SYSTEM: COMBINING EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO ADDRESS EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES

Evolution ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 754-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Locke Rowe ◽  
Göran Arnqvist
Keyword(s):  
Mating System ◽  
Evolutionary Processes ◽  
Antagonistic Coevolution ◽  
Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution

scholarly journals Quantifying the gender load: can population crosses reveal interlocus sexual conflict?

2006 ◽  
Vol 361 (1466) ◽  
pp. 363-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tristan A.F Long ◽  
Robert Montgomerie ◽  
Adam K Chippindale
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Sexual Conflict ◽  
Population Differentiation ◽  
Population Divergence ◽  
Mating Frequency ◽  
Female Reproduction ◽  
Female Fitness ◽  
Antagonistic Coevolution ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution

Six sister populations of Drosophila melanogaster kept under identical environmental conditions for greater than 600 generations were reciprocally crossed to investigate the incidence of population divergence in allopatry. Population crosses directly influenced fitness, mating frequency, and sperm competition patterns. Changes in both female remating rate and the outcome of male sperm competition (P 1 , P 2 ) in response to foreign males were consistent with intersexual coevolution. Moreover, seven of the 30 crosses between foreign mates resulted in significant reductions in female fitness, whereas two resulted in significant increases, compared to local matings. This tendency for foreign males to reduce female fitness may be interpreted as evidence for either sexually antagonistic coevolution or the disruption of mutualistic interactions. However, instances in which female fitness improved via cohabitation with foreign males may better reveal sexual conflict, signalling release from the cost of interacting with locally adapted males. By this metric, female reproduction in D. melanogaster is strongly constrained by local adaptation by males, a situation that would promote antagonistic coevolution between the sexes. We conclude that sexual selection can promote population differentiation in allopatry and that sexual conflict is likely to have played a role in population differentiation in this study system.

scholarly journals The evolution of asymmetric genitalia in Coleoptera

2016 ◽  
Vol 371 (1710) ◽  
pp. 20150400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Menno Schilthuizen ◽  
Paulien de Jong ◽  
Rick van Beek ◽  
Tamara Hoogenboom ◽  
Melanie Meijer zu Schlochtern
Keyword(s):  
Female Choice ◽  
Male Genitalia ◽  
Diverse Group ◽  
Median Lobe ◽  
Animal Kingdom ◽  
Antagonistic Coevolution ◽  
Informal Assessment ◽  
Left Right Asymmetry ◽  
Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution ◽  
Male Genital

The evolution of asymmetry in male genitalia is a pervasive and recurrent phenomenon across almost the entire animal kingdom. Although in some taxa the asymmetry may be a response to the evolution of one-sided, male-above copulation from a more ancestral female-above condition, in other taxa, such as Mammalia and Coleoptera, this explanation appears insufficient. We carried out an informal assessment of genital asymmetry across the Coleoptera and found that male genital asymmetry is present in 43% of all beetle families, and at all within-family taxonomic levels. In the most diverse group, Cucujiformia, however, genital asymmetry is comparatively rare. We also reconstructed the phylogeny of the leiodid tribe Cholevini, and mapped aspects of genital asymmetry on the tree, revealing that endophallus sclerites, endophallus, median lobe and parameres are, in a nested fashion, increasingly unlikely to have evolved asymmetry. We interpret these results in the light of cryptic female choice versus sexually antagonistic coevolution and advocate further ways in which the phenomenon may be better understood. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Provocative questions in left–right asymmetry’.

scholarly journals Escalation and constraints of antagonistic armaments in water striders

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonin Jean Johan Crumière ◽  
David Armisén ◽  
Aïdamalia Vargas-Lowman ◽  
Martha Kubarakos ◽  
Felipe Ferraz Figueiredo Moreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Natural Selection ◽  
Sexual Conflict ◽  
Natural Variation ◽  
Evolutionary Dynamics ◽  
Arms Race ◽  
Trade Off ◽  
Antagonistic Coevolution ◽  
Water Striders ◽  
Mating Performance ◽  
Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution

AbstractSexual conflict may result in the escalating coevolution of sexually antagonistic traits. However, our understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of antagonistic traits and their role in association with sex-specific escalation remains limited. Here we study sexually antagonistic coevolution in a genus of water striders called Rhagovelia. We identified a set of male grasping traits and female anti-grasping traits used during pre-mating struggles and show that natural variation of these traits is associated with variation in mating performance in the direction expected for antagonistic co-evolution. Phylogenetic mapping detected signals of escalation of these sexually antagonistic traits suggesting an ongoing arms race. Moreover, their escalation appears to be constrained by a trade-off with dispersal through flight in both sexes. Altogether our results highlight how sexual interactions may have shaped sex-specific antagonistic traits and how constraints imposed by natural selection may have influenced their evolution.

scholarly journals Sexual conflict in its ecological setting

2018 ◽  
Vol 373 (1757) ◽  
pp. 20170418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer C. Perry ◽  
Locke Rowe
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Local Adaptation ◽  
Sexual Conflict ◽  
Ecological Factors ◽  
Ecological Context ◽  
Theme Issue ◽  
Antagonistic Coevolution ◽  
Water Striders ◽  
Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution ◽  
Gaining Insight

Sexual conflict can lead to rapid and continuous coevolution between females and males, without any inputs from varying ecology. Yet both the degree of conflict and selection on antagonistic traits are known to be sensitive to local ecological conditions. This leads to the longstanding question: to what extent does variation in ecological context drive sexually antagonistic coevolution? In water striders, there is much information about the impacts of ecological factors on conflict, and about patterns of antagonistic coevolution. However, the connection between the two is poorly understood. Here, we first review the multiple ways in which ecological context might affect the coevolutionary trajectory of the sexes. We then review ecological and coevolutionary patterns in water striders, and connections between them, in light of theory and new data. Our analysis suggests that ecological variation does impact observed patterns of antagonistic coevolution, but highlights significant uncertainty due to the multiple pathways by which ecological factors can influence conflict and its evolutionary outcome. To the extent that water striders are a reasonable reflection of other systems, this observation serves as both an opportunity and a warning: there is much to learn, but gaining insight may be a daunting process in many systems. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences'.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document