scholarly journals Minimally invasive endoscopic port-access?intracardiac surgery with one lung ventilation: impact on gas exchange and anaesthesia resources

Anaesthesia ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Kottenberg-Assenmacher ◽  
M. Kamler ◽  
J. Peters
Author(s):  
Pieter W.J. Lozekoot ◽  
Sandro Gelsomino ◽  
Paul B. Kwant ◽  
Orlando Parise ◽  
Francesco Matteucci ◽  
...  

Objective Our aim was to evaluate a new inflatable lung retractor, the “Spacemaker”, and its efficacy in facilitating minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery without the need of one lung ventilation or carbon dioxide overpressure insufflation. Methods The device was tested in 12 anesthetized pigs (90–100 kg) placed on standard endotracheal ventilation. The device was introduced into the right or left side of the chest, depending on the intended procedure to be performed, via a 3-cm incision in the fifth intercostal space. A total of seven animals were used to evaluate hemodynamic and respiratory response to the device, whereas another five animals were used to assess the feasibility of a variety of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgical procedures. Results Introduction was easy and unhindered. The device was inflated up to 0.6 bar, thereby pushing the lung tissue gently away cranially, posteriorly, and caudally without interfering with pulmonary function or resulting in respiratory compromise. In addition, hemodynamics remained stable throughout the experiments. Different closed-chest surgical procedures such as left atrial appendage exclusion, pulmonary vein exposure, pacemaker lead placement, and endoscopic stabilization for coronary surgery, were successfully performed. Removal was quick and complete in all cases, and lung tissue showed no remnant atelectasis. Conclusions The “Spacemaker” may represent a reliable alternative to current conventional techniques to facilitate minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery. Further research is warranted to confirm the effectiveness and the safety of this device and to optimize the model before its use in humans and its introduction into clinical practice.


2004 ◽  
pp. 1604-1609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardo Tusman ◽  
Stephan H. B??hm ◽  
Fernando Su??rez Sipmann ◽  
Stefan Maisch

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco D’Amico ◽  
Simone Serafini ◽  
Michele Finotti ◽  
Marianna Di Bello ◽  
Chiara Di Renzo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Wittenstein ◽  
Martin Scharffenberg ◽  
Xi Ran ◽  
Diana Keller ◽  
Pia Michler ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) allows expiratory flow control, reducing the collapse of the airways during expiration. The performance of FCV during one-lung ventilation (OLV) under intravascular normo- and hypovolaemia is currently unknown. In this explorative study, we hypothesised that OLV with FCV improves PaO2 and reduces mechanical power compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV). Sixteen juvenile pigs were randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) intravascular normovolaemia (n = 8) and (2) intravascular hypovolaemia (n = 8). To mimic inflammation due to major thoracic surgery, a thoracotomy was performed, and 0.5 μg/kg/h lipopolysaccharides from Escherichia coli continuously administered intravenously. Animals were randomly assigned to OLV with one of two sequences (60 min per mode): (1) VCV–FCV or (2) FCV–VCV. Variables of gas exchange, haemodynamics and respiratory signals were collected 20, 40 and 60 min after initiation of OLV with each mechanical ventilation mode. The distribution of ventilation was determined using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Results Oxygenation did not differ significantly between modes (P = 0.881). In the normovolaemia group, the corrected expired minute volume (P = 0.022) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were lower during FCV than VCV. The minute volume (P ≤ 0.001), respiratory rate (P ≤ 0.001), total PEEP (P ≤ 0.001), resistance of the respiratory system (P ≤ 0.001), mechanical power (P ≤ 0.001) and resistive mechanical power (P ≤ 0.001) were lower during FCV than VCV irrespective of the volaemia status. The distribution of ventilation did not differ between both ventilation modes (P = 0.103). Conclusions In a model of OLV in normo- and hypovolemic pigs, mechanical power was lower during FCV compared to VCV, without significant differences in oxygenation. Furthermore, the efficacy of ventilation was higher during FCV compared to VCV during normovolaemia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 802-808
Author(s):  
Li Zhang ◽  
Yu-Ping Wang ◽  
Xiao-Fen Chen ◽  
Zi-Rogn Yan ◽  
Min Zhou

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document