Fine needle aspiration vs. mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermia

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 595-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. El-Haggar ◽  
T. Mostafa ◽  
T. Abdel Nasser ◽  
R. Hany ◽  
A. Abdel Hadi
1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1785-1790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aby Lewin ◽  
Benjamin Reubinoff ◽  
Anat Porat-Katz ◽  
David Weiss ◽  
Vered Eisenberg ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 1764.e7-1764.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Angela Cerruto ◽  
Giovanni Novella ◽  
Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli ◽  
Filiberto Zattoni

2002 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. S209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Tallarini ◽  
Andrea Borini ◽  
Maria Antonietta Bonu ◽  
Vincenzo Distratis ◽  
Andrea Maccolini ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-30
Author(s):  
A. Bettella ◽  
I. M. Tavolini ◽  
B.R. Boscolo ◽  
M. Menegazzo ◽  
M. Rossato ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ponco Birowo ◽  
William Tendi ◽  
Nur Rasyid ◽  
Paul J Turek ◽  
Ivan Rizal Sini ◽  
...  

Background: Management for male infertility can be difficult for some cases. Surgical intervention has long been thought as the last resort to help married couples to conceive. The current guideline recommends testicular sperm extraction with microsurgery technique (microTESE) in severe cases of male infertility. However, the success rate still varies. Thus, a new strategy was needed to further increase the sperm retrieval success rate. Case Presentation: A 39-year-old male with a history of failed sperm extraction, non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and Y-chromosomal microdeletion came to the fertility center to undergo sperm retrieval. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) Mapping was performed prior to microTESE to increase the accuracy of sperm retrieval. After further examination with laser assisted immotile sperm selection (LAISS), five spermatozoa were found. Conclusion: The combination of FNA Mapping and microTESE increases the chance of a successful sperm extraction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document