Male mating success and body size in the European cherry fruit fly,Rhagoletis cerasiL. (Dipt., Tephritidae)

1998 ◽  
Vol 122 (1-5) ◽  
pp. 121-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Jaastad
2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANTHONY HERREL ◽  
JENNIFER A. MOORE ◽  
EVAN M. BREDEWEG ◽  
NICOLA J. NELSON

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 246-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Ritke ◽  
Raymond D. Semlitsch

We studied mating behavior and male mating success in a population of gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis) during 1987 and 1988 in western Tennessee. During 1988, individual males called from 1 to 7 nights ([Formula: see text]) and mated 0–4 times ([Formula: see text]). The number of nights that males called or achieved amplexus was not related to body size, but males that called on more nights had a relatively greater chance of mating. There was no significant difference in body size between mated and unmated males on any of the nights tested. Males that mated or called on a previous night were not more likely to achieve amplexus than males that had not mated previously or those that were new to the population. We have no strong evidence to suggest that assortative mating was characteristic of our population or that male–male aggression directly influences female choice.


Author(s):  
Mayren Sánchez-Rosario ◽  
Diana Pérez-Staples ◽  
Javier Valle-Mora ◽  
Daniel Sánchez-Guillén ◽  
Lorena Ruiz-Montoya ◽  
...  

Abstract Male mating success depends on various traits and factors, and correctly identifying these traits can be key in the context of pest management. For tephritid pests, controlled through the sterile insect technique (SIT) traits, such as male size, can be manipulated through mass-rearing procedures. Thus, it is particularly important to understand whether male size can favor mating success. Here, we evaluated mating success of males of different sizes in Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua, two species controlled through SIT. For both species, a morphometric analysis was performed of mated and unmated mass-reared and wild males in field cages. In both A. ludens and A. obliqua, wild females did not discriminate their mates based on male size and mated more frequently with wild males regardless of size. For mass-reared males, we found no evidence of an advantage of the large males compared to small males in mating success. However, we did find differences between the morphometric traits of mass-reared and wild males. In A. ludens, traits associated to mating success were Face Width (FW), Head Width (HW), Thorax Length (TL) and Wing Length (WL), and for A. obliqua were FW, HW, WL and WW (Wing Width). Overall, FW and TL were more consistent predictors of mating success. In conclusion, female choice seems to suggest multivariate selection, confirming that overall body size (expressed as pupal diameter, which is highly correlated with weight) is not a decisive factor in male mating success in these two species. However, morphological traits such as FW, HW, TL, WL and WW may be relevant in mating preference of wild female.


Copeia ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 1993 (2) ◽  
pp. 561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Madsen ◽  
Richard Shine

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document