Fields as a framework for integrating GIS and environmental process models. Part 2: Specifying field variables

1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
KAREN K KEMP
2019 ◽  
Vol 405 ◽  
pp. 102-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz E. Koralewski ◽  
John K. Westbrook ◽  
William E. Grant ◽  
Hsiao-Hsuan Wang

1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 353-362
Author(s):  
M. B. Beck ◽  
J. B. Watts ◽  
S. Winkler

Success in the development and application of a model requires, as a rule, high-quality field data. In general, studies in controlling the dynamics of wastewater treatment processes have been poorly served in their access to such data. The Environmental Process Control Laboratory has been developed in order to rectify this limitation. The Laboratory is a mobile facility housing instrumentation for on-line respirometry and sensors for real-time monitoring of sludge blanket level and the concentrations of dissolved oxygen, suspended solids, ammonium-N, nitrite-N, total oxidised nitrogen, total organic carbon and orthophosphate-P concentrations. The Laboratory has been designed for deployment in a variety of contexts, but principally in the study of municipal and industrial wastewater treatment, protection of surface water quality, aquaculture, and groundwater contamination. Its purpose is to support the development of process models and, where appropriate, procedures of decision support and automatic control for these systems. Preliminary results from commissioning trials with the Laboratory at the Athens, Georgia, Water Pollution Control Facility Number 2 are reported. These expose some critical issues of signal pre-processing and the need to re-think a strategy for developing models in order to interpret the very large volumes of data generated by the Laboratory.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Ji Ma

AbstractGiven the many types of suboptimality in perception, I ask how one should test for multiple forms of suboptimality at the same time – or, more generally, how one should compare process models that can differ in any or all of the multiple components. In analogy to factorial experimental design, I advocate for factorial model comparison.


2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Monroe ◽  
Bryan L. Koenig ◽  
Kum Seong Wan ◽  
Tei Laine ◽  
Swati Gupta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document