Global human papillomavirus vaccination: can it be cost-effective?

2011 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
EJ Crosbie
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. e003006
Author(s):  
Jessica Ochalek ◽  
Kaja Abbas ◽  
Karl Claxton ◽  
Mark Jit ◽  
James Lomas

IntroductionEstimating the value of providing effective healthcare interventions in a country requires an assessment of whether the improvement in health outcomes they offer exceeds the improvement in health that would have been possible if the resources required had, instead, been made available for other healthcare activities in that country. This potential alternative use of the same resources represents the health opportunity cost of providing the intervention. Without such assessments, there is a danger that blanket recommendations made by international organisations will lead to the adoption of healthcare interventions that are not cost effective in some countries, even given existing donor mechanisms intended to support their affordability.MethodsWe assessed the net health impact to 46 Gavi-eligible countries of achieving one of the WHO’s proposed 90-70-90 targets for cervical cancer elimination, which includes 90% coverage of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among girls by 15 years of age, using published estimates of the expected additional benefits and costs in each country and estimates of the marginal productivity of each healthcare system. We calculated the maximum price each country could afford to pay for HPV vaccination to be cost effective by assessing the net health impact that would be expected to be generated at different potential prices.ResultsAt Gavi negotiated prices, HPV vaccination offers net health benefits across most Gavi-eligible countries included in this study. However, if Gavi-eligible countries faced the average price faced by non-Gavi eligible countries, providing HPV vaccination would result in reduced overall population health in most countries.ConclusionEstimates of the net health impact of providing a healthcare intervention can be used to assess the benefit (or lack of) to countries of adhering to global guidance, inform negotiations with donors, as well as pricing negotiations and the value of developing new healthcare interventions.


Author(s):  
Mehdi Yousefi ◽  
Malihe Hasanzadeh ◽  
Vesam Rostaminezhad ◽  
Maryam Gaffarean ◽  
Azam Sadat Mousavi

Vaccine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (37) ◽  
pp. 4923-4929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhang ◽  
David G. Regan ◽  
Jason J. Ong ◽  
Manoj Gambhir ◽  
Eric P.F. Chow ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 02 (04) ◽  
pp. 193-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudeep Gupta ◽  
Rajendra A. Kerkar ◽  
Rajesh Dikshit ◽  
Rajendra A. Badwe

AbstractTwo vaccines that protect against infection by some of the oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes have recently been licensed for use in population-based vaccination strategies in many countries. However, these products are being promoted as ‘cervical cancer vaccines’ based on inadequate data. Specifically, there remain several concerns about the duration of immunogenicity, length of follow-up of trial subjects, endpoints chosen in vaccine trials, applicability of trial results to real populations, the safety of these products, and their cost-effectiveness as public health interventions. Furthermore, it is unlikely that vaccination will obviate the need for setting up robust and cost-effective screening programs in countries like India. This article will discuss various aspects of HPV vaccination from a public health perspective, especially from the point of view of its relevance to India and other South Asian countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document