scholarly journals Using the prone position for ventilated patients with respiratory failure: a review

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angie D Wright ◽  
Maria Flynn
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Prone position ventilation in the Role 2 Afloat environment

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
A Hill ◽  
C Hillman ◽  
T E Scott
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Knowledge Base ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Material Resources ◽  
Life Saving ◽  
Hypoxic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Ventilated Patients

AbstractProne position ventilation is a life-saving technique for the management of hypoxic respiratory failure in ventilated patients. It has particular application in the isolated Role 2 Afloat (R2A) environment where both human and material resources are limited. It can be achieved with minimal training. This article describes the rationale behind prone position ventilation and equips the reader with the knowledge base that will allow the technique to be instigated.

scholarly journals Prone Position in Intubated, Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Coronavirus Disease-19.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Langer ◽  
Matteo Brioni ◽  
Amedeo Guzzardella ◽  
Eleonora Carlesso ◽  
Luca Cabrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
National Cohort ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Abstract Background: Limited data are available on the use of prone position in intubated, invasively ventilated patients with Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Aim of this study is to investigate the use and effect of prone position in this population during the first 2020 pandemic wave.Methods: Retrospective, multicentre, national cohort study conducted between February 24 and June 14, 2020 in 24 Italian Intensive Care Units (ICU) on adult patients needing invasive mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure caused by COVID-19.Clinical data were collected on the day of ICU admission. Information regarding the use of prone position were collected daily. Follow-up for patient outcomes was performed on July 15, 2020. The respiratory effects of the first prone position were studied in a subset of 78 patients. Patients were classified as Responders if the PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased ≥ 20 mmHg during prone position. Results: Of 1057 included patients, mild, moderate and severe ARDS was present in 15, 50 and 35% of patients, respectively and had a resulting mortality of 25, 33 and 41%. Prone position was applied in 61% of the patients. Patients placed prone had a more severe disease and died significantly more (45% vs 33%, p<0.001). Overall, prone position induced a significant increase in PaO2/FiO2 ratio, while no change in respiratory system compliance was observed. Seventy-eight % of patients were Responders to prone position. Non-Responders had a more severe respiratory failure and died more often in the ICU (65% vs. 38%, p=0.047).Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, prone position has been widely adopted to treat mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure. The majority of patients improved their oxygenation during prone position, most likely due to a better ventilation perfusion matching.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT04388670

scholarly journals Prone position in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a multi-centric study of more than 1000 patients

Critical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Langer ◽  
◽  
Matteo Brioni ◽  
Amedeo Guzzardella ◽  
Eleonora Carlesso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
National Cohort ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Abstract Background Limited data are available on the use of prone position in intubated, invasively ventilated patients with Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Aim of this study is to investigate the use and effect of prone position in this population during the first 2020 pandemic wave. Methods Retrospective, multicentre, national cohort study conducted between February 24 and June 14, 2020, in 24 Italian Intensive Care Units (ICU) on adult patients needing invasive mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure caused by COVID-19. Clinical data were collected on the day of ICU admission. Information regarding the use of prone position was collected daily. Follow-up for patient outcomes was performed on July 15, 2020. The respiratory effects of the first prone position were studied in a subset of 78 patients. Patients were classified as Oxygen Responders if the PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased ≥ 20 mmHg during prone position and as Carbon Dioxide Responders if the ventilatory ratio was reduced during prone position. Results Of 1057 included patients, mild, moderate and severe ARDS was present in 15, 50 and 35% of patients, respectively, and had a resulting mortality of 25, 33 and 41%. Prone position was applied in 61% of the patients. Patients placed prone had a more severe disease and died significantly more (45% vs. 33%, p < 0.001). Overall, prone position induced a significant increase in PaO2/FiO2 ratio, while no change in respiratory system compliance or ventilatory ratio was observed. Seventy-eight % of the subset of 78 patients were Oxygen Responders. Non-Responders had a more severe respiratory failure and died more often in the ICU (65% vs. 38%, p = 0.047). Forty-seven % of patients were defined as Carbon Dioxide Responders. These patients were older and had more comorbidities; however, no difference in terms of ICU mortality was observed (51% vs. 37%, p = 0.189 for Carbon Dioxide Responders and Non-Responders, respectively). Conclusions During the COVID-19 pandemic, prone position has been widely adopted to treat mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure. The majority of patients improved their oxygenation during prone position, most likely due to a better ventilation perfusion matching. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT04388670

scholarly journals Nursing care and prevalence of adverse events in prone position: Characteristics of mechanically ventilated patients with severe SARS‐CoV‐2 pulmonary infection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Dolores Rodríguez‐Huerta ◽  
Ana Díez‐Fernández ◽  
María Jesús Rodríguez‐Alonso ◽  
María Robles‐González ◽  
María Martín‐Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Pulmonary Infection ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Ventilated Patients

scholarly journals Standard Care Versus Awake Prone Position in Adult Nonintubated Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Secondary to COVID-19 Infection—A Multicenter Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 088506662110144
Author(s):  
Devachandran Jayakumar ◽  
Pratheema Ramachandran, DNB ◽  
Ebenezer Rabindrarajan, DNB ◽  
Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, MD ◽  
Nagarajan Ramakrishnan, AB ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hypoxic Respiratory Failure

Rationale: The feasibility and safety of awake prone positioning and its impact on outcomes in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to COVID-19 is unknown. Results of the observational studies published during this pandemic have been conflicting. In this context, we conducted a multi-center, parallel group, randomized controlled feasibility study on awake prone positioning in non-intubated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring supplemental oxygen. Methods: 60 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia requiring 4 or more liters of oxygen to maintain a saturation of ≥92% were recruited in this study. Thirty patients each were randomized to either standard care or awake prone group. Patients randomized to the prone group were encouraged to self-prone for at least 6 hours a day. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients adhering to the protocol in each group. Results: In the prone group, 43% (13 out of 30) of patients were able to self-prone for 6 or more hours a day. In the supine group, 47% (14 out of 30) were completely supine and 53% spent some hours in the prone position, but none exceeded 6 hours. There was no significant difference in any of the secondary outcomes between the 2 groups and there were no adverse events. Conclusions: Awake prone positioning in non-intubated patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure is feasible and safe under clinical trial conditions. The results of our feasibility study will potentially help in the design of larger definitive trials to address this key knowledge gap.

The Feasibility of Objective Sleep-Quality Assessment in an ICU Setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-309
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Sleep Stages ◽  
Poor Sleep ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Background: Sleep disruptions frequently occur in hospitalized patients, especially with critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Severely altered sleep architectures result in unclassifiable sleep stages as listed by the conventional Rechtschaffen and Kales (R&K) criteria, and a new classification for sleep scoring including atypical sleep (AS) and pathological wakefulness (PW) has recently been proposed. Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of performing objective sleep qualification in patients receiving mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory failure. Materials and Methods: In the present prospective cohort study, polysomnography was performed in 38 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory failure at the respiratory care unit (RCU) of Siriraj Hospital between February and December 2017. Their sleep stages were analyzed by conventional rules and the new classifications of AS and PW. The associations between the presence of AS or PW and the patients’ characteristics were analyzed. Correlations between sleep quality and clinical parameters were also determined. Results: Most of the patients had poor sleep quality with median sleep efficiency (IQR) of 35.9% (18.5, 62.3) and significantly decreased slowwave sleep [median (IQR) 0.4% (0.00, 5.70)] and REM [median (IQR) 1.3% (0.00, 6.43)]. According to the new classifications, 14 out of 38 (prevalence of 36.8%) mechanically ventilated patients had AS. The prevalence of PW and either AS or PW were 36.8% and 52.6%, respectively. A higher baseline respiratory rate was observed among patients who had either AS or PW at 24 versus 20 breaths/minute (p=0.02), while a longer duration of mechanical ventilator support was found in patients with PW at nine versus five (p=0.003). Patient-ventilator asynchrony was also noted in all patients. Conclusion: Sleep quality among critically ill and mechanically ventilated patients was severely disturbed. A higher prevalence of AS and PW were noted. The technical feasibility of sleep recording in Thai intensive care unit (ICU) settings was established. Keywords: Polysomnography, Atypical sleep, ICU

scholarly journals Outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure caused by COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (6) ◽  
pp. e480-e483
Author(s):  
Luigi Camporota ◽  
Barnaby Sanderson ◽  
Alison Dixon ◽  
Francesco Vasques ◽  
Andrew Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Ventilated Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document