The Feasibility of Objective Sleep-Quality Assessment in an ICU Setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-309
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Sleep Stages ◽  
Poor Sleep ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Background: Sleep disruptions frequently occur in hospitalized patients, especially with critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Severely altered sleep architectures result in unclassifiable sleep stages as listed by the conventional Rechtschaffen and Kales (R&K) criteria, and a new classification for sleep scoring including atypical sleep (AS) and pathological wakefulness (PW) has recently been proposed. Objective: To demonstrate the feasibility of performing objective sleep qualification in patients receiving mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory failure. Materials and Methods: In the present prospective cohort study, polysomnography was performed in 38 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory failure at the respiratory care unit (RCU) of Siriraj Hospital between February and December 2017. Their sleep stages were analyzed by conventional rules and the new classifications of AS and PW. The associations between the presence of AS or PW and the patients’ characteristics were analyzed. Correlations between sleep quality and clinical parameters were also determined. Results: Most of the patients had poor sleep quality with median sleep efficiency (IQR) of 35.9% (18.5, 62.3) and significantly decreased slowwave sleep [median (IQR) 0.4% (0.00, 5.70)] and REM [median (IQR) 1.3% (0.00, 6.43)]. According to the new classifications, 14 out of 38 (prevalence of 36.8%) mechanically ventilated patients had AS. The prevalence of PW and either AS or PW were 36.8% and 52.6%, respectively. A higher baseline respiratory rate was observed among patients who had either AS or PW at 24 versus 20 breaths/minute (p=0.02), while a longer duration of mechanical ventilator support was found in patients with PW at nine versus five (p=0.003). Patient-ventilator asynchrony was also noted in all patients. Conclusion: Sleep quality among critically ill and mechanically ventilated patients was severely disturbed. A higher prevalence of AS and PW were noted. The technical feasibility of sleep recording in Thai intensive care unit (ICU) settings was established. Keywords: Polysomnography, Atypical sleep, ICU

scholarly journals Selection strategy for sedation depth in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (S2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Longxiang Su ◽  
Chun Liu ◽  
Fengxiang Chang ◽  
Bo Tang ◽  
Lin Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Dimensionality Reduction ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Latent Profile Analysis ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Sedation And Analgesia ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Abstract Background Analgesia and sedation therapy are commonly used for critically ill patients, especially mechanically ventilated patients. From the initial nonsedation programs to deep sedation and then to on-demand sedation, the understanding of sedation therapy continues to deepen. However, according to different patient’s condition, understanding the individual patient’s depth of sedation needs remains unclear. Methods The public open source critical illness database Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III was used in this study. Latent profile analysis was used as a clustering method to classify mechanically ventilated patients based on 36 variables. Principal component analysis dimensionality reduction was used to select the most influential variables. The ROC curve was used to evaluate the classification accuracy of the model. Results Based on 36 characteristic variables, we divided patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and sedation and analgesia into two categories with different mortality rates, then further reduced the dimensionality of the data and obtained the 9 variables that had the greatest impact on classification, most of which were ventilator parameters. According to the Richmond-ASS scores, the two phenotypes of patients had different degrees of sedation and analgesia, and the corresponding ventilator parameters were also significantly different. We divided the validation cohort into three different levels of sedation, revealing that patients with high ventilator conditions needed a deeper level of sedation, while patients with low ventilator conditions required reduction in the depth of sedation as soon as possible to promote recovery and avoid reinjury. Conclusion Through latent profile analysis and dimensionality reduction, we divided patients treated with mechanical ventilation and sedation and analgesia into two categories with different mortalities and obtained 9 variables that had the greatest impact on classification, which revealed that the depth of sedation was limited by the condition of the respiratory system.

scholarly journals Association of weaning preparedness with extubation outcome of mechanically ventilated patients in medical intensive care units: a retrospective analysis

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e8973
Author(s):  
Feng-Ching Lin ◽  
Yao-Wen Kuo ◽  
Jih-Shuin Jerng ◽  
Huey-Dong Wu
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Extubation Failure ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Failure Group ◽  
Medical Intensive Care ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Background Assessment of preparedness of weaning has been recommended before extubation for mechanically ventilated patients. We aimed to understand the association of a structured assessment of weaning preparedness with successful liberation. Methods We retrospectively investigated patients with acute respiratory failure who experienced an extubation trial at the medical intensive care units of a medical center and compared the demographic and clinical characteristics between those patients with successful and failed extubation. A composite score to assess the preparedness of weaning, the WEANSNOW score, was generated consisting of eight components, including Weaning parameters, Endotracheal tube, Arterial blood gas analysis, Nutrition, Secretions, Neuromuscular-affecting agents, Obstructive airway problems and Wakefulness. The prognostic ability of the WEANSNOW score for extubation was then analyzed. Results Of the 205 patients included, 138 (67.3%) patients had successful extubation. Compared with the failure group, the success group had a significantly shorter duration of MV before the weaning attempt (11.2 ± 11.6 vs. 31.7 ± 26.2 days, p < 0.001), more with congestive heart failure (42.0% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.020), and had different distribution of the types of acute respiratory failure (p = 0.037). The failure group also had a higher WEANSNOW score (1.22 ± 0.85 vs. 0.51 ± 0.71, p < 0.001) and worse Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (93.9 ± 63.8 vs. 56.3 ± 35.1, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a WEANSNOW Score = 1 or higher (OR = 2.880 (95% CI [1.291–6.426]), p = 0.010) and intubation duration >21 days (OR = 7.752 (95% CI [3.560–16.879]), p < 0.001) were independently associated with an increased probability of extubation failure. Conclusion Assessing the pre-extubation status of intubated patients in a checklist-based approach using the WEANSNOW score might provide valuable insights into extubation failure in patients in a medical ICU for acute respiratory failure. Further prospective studies are warranted to elucidate the practice of assessing weaning preparedness.

scholarly journals An examination of sedation requirements and practices for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditi Balakrishna ◽  
Elisa C Walsh ◽  
Arzo Hamidi ◽  
Sheri Berg ◽  
Daniel Austin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Massachusetts General Hospital ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Impression ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Abstract Purpose Preliminary reports suggest that critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection requiring mechanical ventilation may have markedly increased sedation needs compared with non–mechanically ventilated patients. We conducted a study to examine sedative use for this patient population within multiple intensive care units (ICUs) of a large academic medical center. Methods A retrospective, single-center cohort study of sedation practices for critically ill patients with COVID-19 during the first 10 days of mechanical ventilation was conducted in 8 ICUs at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. The study population was a sequential cohort of 86 critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Data characterizing the sedative medications, doses, drug combinations, and duration of administration were collected daily and compared to published recommendations for sedation of critically ill patients without COVID-19. The associations between drug doses, number of drugs administered, baseline patient characteristics, and inflammatory markers were investigated. Results Among the study cohort, propofol and hydromorphone were the most common initial drug combination, with these medications being used on a given day in up to 100% and 88% of patients, respectively. The doses of sedative and analgesic infusions increased for patients over the first 10 days, reaching or exceeding the upper limits of published dosage guidelines for propofol (48% of patients), dexmedetomidine (29%), midazolam (7.7%), ketamine (32%), and hydromorphone (38%). The number of sedative and analgesic agents simultaneously administered increased over time for each patient, with more than 50% of patients requiring 3 or more agents by day 2. Compared with patients requiring 3 or fewer agents, as a group patients requiring more than 3 agents were of younger age, had an increased body mass index, increased serum ferritin and lactate dehydrogenase concentrations, had a lower PaO2:FIO2 (ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen), and were more likely to receive neuromuscular blockade. Conclusion Our study confirmed the clinical impression of elevated sedative use in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 relative to guideline-recommended sedation practices in other critically ill populations.

scholarly journals Tracheostomy Practice in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Single-center Retrospective Study With Focus on Tracheomalacia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Guarnieri ◽  
Patrizia Andreoni ◽  
Hedwige Gay ◽  
Riccardo Giudici ◽  
Maurizio Bottiroli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated ◽  
Mechanically Ventilated Patients ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Ventilated Patients

Abstract Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic increased the number of patients needing invasive mechanical ventilation, either through an endotracheal tube or through a tracheostomy. Tracheomalacia is a rare, but potentially severe complication of mechanical ventilation, which can significantly complicate the weaning process. Aim of this study was to describe the strategies of airway management in mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2, the incidence of severe tracheomalacia, and investigate the factors associated with its occurrence.Methods. Retrospective, single-center study performed in an Italian teaching hospital. All adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) between February 24 and June 30, 2020, treated with invasive mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure caused by SARS-CoV-2 were included. Clinical data were collected on the day of ICU admission, while information regarding airway management was collected daily.Results. A total of 151 patients were included in the study. On admission, ARDS severity was mild in 21%, moderate in 62%, and severe in 17% of the cases, with an overall mortality of 39.7%. A tracheostomy was performed in 73 (48.3%) patients: open surgical technique in 54 patients (74%) and percutaneous Ciaglia technique in 19 patients (26%). Patients in whom a tracheostomy was performed had, compared to the other patients, a longer duration of mechanical ventilation and longer ICU and hospital length of stay. Tracheomalacia was diagnosed in 8 (5%) patients. The factors associated with tracheomalacia were female sex, obesity, and tracheostomy.Conclusions. In our population, approximately 50% of patients with ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 were tracheostomized. Tracheostomized patients had a longer ICU and hospital length of stay. Five percent of our population was diagnosed with tracheomalacia. This percentage is 10 times higher than what is reported in available literature and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document