Resistance to Subsidence of an Uncemented Femoral Stem After Cerclage Wiring of a Fissure

2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan S. McCulloch ◽  
Simon C. Roe ◽  
Denis J. Marcellin-Little ◽  
Peter L. Mente
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 322-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munnan Al-Najjim ◽  
Usman Khattak ◽  
Juluis Sim ◽  
Iain Chambers

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Jenny Kiratli ◽  
Mary M. Checovich ◽  
Andrew A. McBeath ◽  
Michael A. Wilson ◽  
John P. Heiner

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e19.00662-e19.00662
Author(s):  
Valerie Polster ◽  
Robert Hube ◽  
Michael M. Morlock

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (06) ◽  
pp. 409-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Korani ◽  
D. J. Marcellin-Little ◽  
S. C. Roe

SummaryObjective: Evaluate variability associated with assessing changes in the position of uncemented femoral stems.Methods: Stem level, canal fill, stem angle, and version angle were measured on craniocaudal horizontal beam (CCHB) and open leg lateral (OLL) radiographic projections of the femur of 20 dogs that had uncemented total hip replacement. Intraobserver and inter -observer repeatability were determined on immediate postoperative (PO) images. Differences in position were calculated between the first (3 months – R1) and second (6 months – R2) re-evaluation (R1-R2) time points, and between PO and R1.Results: The measurement process was very repeatable. For R1-R2, the stem appeared to subside 0.8 ± 1.4 mm for measurements based on the greater trochanter on the CCHB images, but there was a wide range (-3.9 to 2 mm; positive values indicate proximad movement). Measurements based on the inter-trochanteric crest on the OLL images had the same mean, and also a wide range (-4.4 to 2.1 mm; negative values indicate proximad movement). For PO-R1, the stem appeared to subside 1.8 ± 2.0 mm (CCHB, based on the greater trochanter, range -7.7 to 2.2 mm), 1.6 ± 1.5 mm (CCHB, based on the intertrochanteric crest, range -0.7 to 4.3 mm); and 2.1 ± 2.1 mm (OLL, based on the intertrochanteric crest, range -1.6 to 6.8 mm).Conclusion: The position of a stable stem can appear different on subsequent re-evaluations, but this may be due to variability associated with inconsistency of positioning of the patient and limb.Clinical significance: Documenting subsidence in individual patients should not rely on calculations based on a single measurement.


2011 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stergios Lazarinis ◽  
Johan Kärrholm ◽  
Nils P Hailer

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 330-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathrine H. Enoksen ◽  
Nils R. Gjerdet ◽  
Jomar Klaksvik ◽  
Astvaldur J. Arthursson ◽  
Otto Schnell-Husby ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document