Backup Right Ventricular Pacing with a 0.035″ Guidewire during Implantation of Left Ventricular Leads

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S12-S15
Author(s):  
HARAN BURRI ◽  
HENRI SUNTHORN ◽  
MARC ZIMMERMANN ◽  
CARINE STETTLER ◽  
DIPEN SHAH
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Solaiman Algazzar ◽  
Azza Ali Katta ◽  
Khaled Sayed Ahmed ◽  
Nasima Mohamed Elkenany ◽  
Maher Abdelaleem Ibrahim

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Xia Niu ◽  
Xi Liu ◽  
Min Gu ◽  
Xuhua Chen ◽  
Chi Cai ◽  
...  

Introduction: For patients who develop atrioventricular block (AVB) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), right ventricular pacing (RVP) may be associated with adverse outcomes. We assessed the feasibility of conduction system pacing (CSP) in patients who developed AVB following TAVR and compared the procedural and clinical outcomes with RVP.Methods: Consecutive patients who developed AVB following TAVR were prospectively enrolled, and were implanted with RVP or CSP. Procedural and clinical outcomes were compared among different pacing modalities.Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled, including 10 who were implanted with His bundle pacing (HBP), 20 with left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), and 30 with RVP. The HBP group had significantly lower implant success rate, higher capture threshold, and lower R-wave amplitude than the LBBP and RVP groups (p < 0.01, respectively). The RVP group had a significantly longer paced QRS duration (153.5 ± 6.8 ms, p < 0.01) than the other two groups (HBP: 121.8 ± 8.6 ms; LBBP: 120.2 ± 10.6 ms). During a mean follow-up of 15.0 ± 9.1 months, the LBBP group had significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (54.9 ± 6.7% vs. 48.9 ± 9.1%, p < 0.05) and shorter left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (49.7 ± 5.6 mm vs. 55.0 ± 7.7 mm, p < 0.05) than the RVP group. While the HBP group showed trends of higher LVEF (p = 0.016) and shorter LVEDD (p = 0.017) than the RVP group. Four patients in the RVP group died—three deaths were due to progressive heart failure and one was due to non-cardiac reasons. One death in the LBBP group was due to the non-cardiac reasons.Conclusions: CSP achieved shorter paced QRS duration and better cardiac structure and function in post-TAVR patients than RVP. LBBP had a higher implant success rate and better pacing parameters than HBP.


1985 ◽  
Vol 248 (4) ◽  
pp. H523-H533 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Bahler ◽  
P. Martin

Afterload, activation sequence, inotropism, and extent of shortening affect the time constant (T) of left ventricular (LV) isovolumic pressure decay, yet it is unknown if they modify peak lengthening velocity of the LV minor axis [(dD/dt)/D]. Accordingly, we studied their effects on (dD/dt)/D, measured by sonomicrometry, in nine anesthetized open-chest dogs during atrial pacing at 2 Hz. Afterload was increased 20-40 mmHg by 1) constricting the ascending aorta and 2) occluding the descending aorta for four beats. Activation was altered by right ventricular pacing. These interventions, plus constriction of venae cavae, were studied during four inotropic states. Aortic stenosis increased (dD/dt)/D (P less than 0.05), whereas occlusion of the descending aorta, vena caval constriction, and right ventricular pacing decreased (dD/dt)/D (P less than 0.05). Left atrial pressure was constant except during vena caval constriction. Alterations in inotropic state modified (dD/dt)/D (P less than 0.001). Extent of shortening and (dD/dt)/D were directly related (r = 0.80, P less than 0.001). Changes in (dD/dt)/D and T were inversely related (r = 0.70, P less than 0.001), and alterations in the interval from -dP/dtpeak to the end of rapid filling were directly related to changes in T (r = 0.75, P less than 0.001). We conclude that (dD/dt)/D can be modified by systolic and diastolic load perturbations, activation sequence, and inotropic interventions. These effects relate to changes in extent of shortening, time course of inactivation, or both.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document