Elective Coronary Stenting Increases Fractional Flow Reserve in Other Arteries due to an Increase in Microvascular Resistance: Clinical Implications for Assessment of Multivessel Disease

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 520-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHEN P. HOOLE ◽  
PATRICK M. HECK ◽  
ANDREW C. EPSTEIN ◽  
SARAH C. CLARKE ◽  
NICK E. J. WEST ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 122 (24) ◽  
pp. 2545-2550 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Fearon ◽  
Bernhard Bornschein ◽  
Pim A.L. Tonino ◽  
Raffaella M. Gothe ◽  
Bernard De Bruyne ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Narbeh Melikian ◽  
Pieter De Bondt ◽  
Thomas Cuisset ◽  
Eric Wyffels ◽  
Jozef Bartunek ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION In patients with angiographic 3 vessel disease only 29% have been reported to have perfusion defects. However the association between physiological evidence for ischemia per vessel derived from fractional flow reserve (FFR) and MIBI SPECT (SPECT) in multivessel disease (MVD) is unknown. We comapred this association in patients with MVD. METHOD In 84 vascular territories in 28 patients (mean age 63.9±9.8 years, LV ejection fraction 69±12%) with angiographic MVD (>50% stenosis in at least 2 vessels) results of SPECT (rest / stress adenosine) were compared to FFR measurements in each coronary vessel. AHA semi-quantitative 5 point scorning system using a 17-segment model was used to report SPECT scans. A FFR <0.80 was taken as evidence for ischemia. RESULTS MIBI was positive in at least 1 territory in 19 (67%) and FFR <0.80 in at least 1 territory in 23 (82%) of patients. 7 (25%) patients with no perfusion defect on SPECT had FFR <0.80 in at least 2 territories. The association between MIBI and FFR in each patient and per vascular territory are summarised below. Per patient there was no concordance between SPECT and FFR (Kappa −0.11) and per vascular territory there was poor concordance between SPECT and FFR (Kappa 0.23). In 8 (29%) patients both SPECT and FFR detected identical ischemic territories [mean number of ischemic territories: 1.5±0.9 for both; P=1.00]. In the remaining 20 patients in comparison to FFR, SPECT either underestimated [9 (32%) patients − mean number of ischemic territories, SPECT: 0.3±0.7, FFR: 1.9±0.6; P=0.001] or overestimated [11 (39%) patients -mean number of ischemic territories, MIBI: 2.0±1.0, FFR: 1.0±0.9; P=0.02] the number of ischemic territories. There was a weak correlation between severity of ischemia as assessed by SPECT in each vascular territory and the actual FFR value (r=0.34; P=0.001). CONCLUSION In patients with multivessel disease, the concordance between SPECT and FFR to localise hemodynamically significant stenosis is poor. Per Patient and per vascular territory comparison of MIBI SPECT and FFR


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 640-643
Author(s):  
Emanuele Barbato ◽  
Fabio Mangiacapra

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the invasive standard of reference in identifying haemodynamically significant stenoses, those that are able to induce reversible myocardial ischaemia. Although defined as the ratio of maximum blood flow in a stenotic coronary to maximum blood flow if the same coronary would be normal, FFR is expressed as the ratio of two pressures: the distal coronary pressure measured by an intracoronary pressure guidewire and the proximal coronary or aortic pressure measured at the tip of the guiding catheter during maximal coronary hyperaemia. A threshold value of FFR less than or equal to 0.80 is currently recommended to indicate or defer coronary revascularization. In fact, a FFR-guided revascularization strategy has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing adverse events in a number of anatomical lesion subsets, including intermediate coronary stenoses, left main stenoses, multivessel disease, bifurcation lesions, sequential stenoses, stented vessels, and bypass grafts. There is growing interest in the use of FFR also in the setting of acute coronary syndrome. In patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction, FFR has been adopted to assess intermediate stenoses incidentally found in non-culprit coronaries, and may be useful to guide the completeness of revascularization in the presence of multivessel disease. Finally, FFR is emerging as a novel potential area for invasive functional assessment of coronary atherosclerotic disease in patients with aortic stenosis, due to the increasing indications to transcatheter aortic valve implantation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document