High Order Aberrations of the eye implanted the Verisyse® iris-claw intraocular lens

2007 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
JJ GICQUEL ◽  
ME LANGMAN ◽  
JL NGUYEN KHOA ◽  
M MERCIE ◽  
PL DIGHIERO
2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 969-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Futoshi Taketani ◽  
Eiichi Yukawa ◽  
Toshiaki Yoshii ◽  
Yuuko Sugie ◽  
Yoshiaki Hara

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 785
Author(s):  
I-Chia Liang ◽  
Yun-Hsiang Chang ◽  
Adrián Hernández Hernández Martínez ◽  
Chi-Feng Hung

Background and Objectives: Iris-claw intraocular lens (ICIOL) could be implanted in the anterior chamber (AC) or retropupillary (RP) in eyes lacking capsular and/or zonular support. Several studies have focused on comparing the efficacy and complications of these two techniques and we designed this research to review the published literatures. Materials and Methods: Peer-reviewed studies were collected through network databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov) and analyzed. The primary outcome was the standardized mean differences (SMDs) of pre- and post-operative corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA). The secondary outcome was the SMDs of pre- and post-operative intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell counts (ECC), and the odds ratios (ORs) of post-operative IOP elevation and cystoid macular edema (CME). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software was utilized to conduct statistical analysis. Results: Six studies (one randomized controlled trial and five retrospective case series) were relevant and included a total of 516 eyes (255 and 261 eyes in the AC ICIOL and RP ICIOL groups, respectively). The quantitative analysis showed no significant differences in CDVA (SMD: 0.164, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.171 to 0.500), ECC (SMD: −0.011, 95% CI: −0.195 to 0.173), and IOP elevation events (OR: 0.797, 95% CI: 0.459 to 1.383). Lesser IOP reduction (SMD: 0.257, 95%CI: 0.023 to 0.490) and a relative increase in the incidence of CME (OR:2.315, 95% CI: 0.950 to 5.637) were observed in the AC ICIOL group compared with RP ICIOL group. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis indicated that AC and RP ICIOL seem to have equivalent visual outcomes. RP ICIOL may perform slightly better with more IOP reduction and lesser CME. More randomized controlled trials, which have higher patient participation and more outcomes are needed to confirm our conclusions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byoung Seon Kim ◽  
Byung Jae Kim ◽  
In Young Chung ◽  
Seong Wook Seo ◽  
Ji Myong Yoo ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-439
Author(s):  
Spyridon E. Chalkiadakis ◽  
Efstratios A. Parikakis ◽  
Simon R.J. Taylor

Background: The surgical case of a dropped intraocular lens inside the vitreous cavity constitutes a real challenge for the operating surgeon. Herein, we describe a case series where an alternative optical rehabilitation technique for late intraocular lens-bag complex dislocation has been used. Methods: A modern vitrectomy device was used to remove the capsule with the dropped intraocular lens using sutureless 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. To ensure a better aesthetic result, with faster patient recovery and a reduced number of operations, the whole procedure was performed during the same operating session; an iris-claw intraocular lens for aphakia was selected for implantation. The implant was passed behind the constricted iris with the concave surface facing it. The lens was grasped with the manufacturer’s holding forceps and fixed onto the posterior surface of the iris using the special enclavation needles. Results: We have operated 12 eyes in two different clinical centres successfully, with minimal intra- and/or postoperative complications. Conclusion: We believe that this is a viable solution for the visual rehabilitation of patients, who would otherwise need more than one operation for a lens exchange.


2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Elliott ◽  
S. S. Choi ◽  
N. Doble ◽  
J. L. Hardy ◽  
J. W. Evans ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sadık Görkem Çevik ◽  
Muhammer Özgür Çevik ◽  
Ahmet Tuncer Özmen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document