Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography-derived laboratory-based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Behneke ◽  
Matthias Burwinkel ◽  
Kristian Knierim ◽  
Nikolaus Behneke
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiro Munakata ◽  
Koudai Nagata ◽  
Minoru Sanda ◽  
Ryota Kawamata ◽  
Daisuke Sato ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The vertical thickness of the peri-implant mucosa is associated with the amount of post treatment marginal bone loss. However, the variations in mucosal thickness at the different edentulous sites have been sparsely documented. The purpose of the study was to conduct a survey of the frequency distribution of variations in mucosal thickness at the different sites of the edentulous alveolar ridge and to compare them according to gender. Our study included 125 partially edentulous patients having a total of 296 implant sites. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were obtained by placing a diagnostic template with a radiopaque crown indicator on the ridge to determine the mucosal thickness at the crest of the alveolar ridge. Results The mucosal thickness was 3.0±1.3 mm in the maxilla, which was significantly greater than the mucosal thickness of 2.0±1.0 mm in the mandible (p<0.001). In both the maxilla and the mandible, the mucosa was the thickest in the anterior region, followed by the premolar and molar regions. Sites were further classified into two groups based on whether the mucosal thickness was greater than 2 mm. In the mandible, more than half of the sites showed a mucosal thickness of 2 mm or less. Conclusions Although this study was a limited preoperative study, the vertical mucosal thickness at the edentulous ridge differed between the maxillary and mandibular regions. The majority of sites in the mandibular molar region had a mucosal thickness of less than 2 mm. Practitioners might be able to develop an optimal dental implant treatment plan for long-term biologic and esthetic stability by considering these factors.


2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 369-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
FK Panzarella ◽  
JLC Junqueira ◽  
LB Oliveira ◽  
NS de Araújo ◽  
C Costa

Author(s):  
Lucas P. Lopes Rosado ◽  
Izabele Sales Barbosa ◽  
Rafael Binato Junqueira ◽  
Ana Paula Varela Brown Martins ◽  
Francielle Silvestre Verner

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
AnujSingh Parihar ◽  
PradyumnaKumar Sahoo ◽  
Vaibhav Awinashe ◽  
Yashika Bali ◽  
Nitika Gupta ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Su-Yeoun Jang ◽  
Kwang Chung ◽  
Seunggon Jung ◽  
Hong-Ju Park ◽  
Hee-Kyun Oh ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1291-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.T. Primo ◽  
A.C. Presotto ◽  
H.W. de Oliveira ◽  
H.T. Gassen ◽  
S.A.Q. Miguens ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document