Diagnosis of blue nevus-like metastatic uveal melanoma confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for monosomy 3

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 621-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus J. Busam ◽  
Yuqiang Fang ◽  
Suresh Jhanwar ◽  
Mario Lacouture
2009 ◽  
Vol 133 (8) ◽  
pp. 1219-1222
Author(s):  
Lynn Schoenfield ◽  
James Pettay ◽  
Raymond R. Tubbs ◽  
Arun D. Singh

Abstract Context.—Determining the most significant prognostic variables in uveal melanoma is important for stratifying patients for metastasis surveillance and possible initiation of chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Monosomy 3, one such variable, can be determined using fluorescence in situ hybridization, either on enucleated samples, fine-needle aspiration biopsy, or tumor sample obtained by vitrector. Objective.—To evaluate possible regional discordance in chromosome 3 by sites likely to be sampled by different biopsy methods. Design.—Eighteen consecutive patients with uveal melanoma who underwent primary enucleation were studied. Representative paraffin blocks were selected based on review of hematoxylin-eosin stained sections, and the apex and base of each tumor was demarcated. Unstained paraffin sections, 4 μm in thickness, were prepared, and fluorescence in situ hybridization, looking for monosomy 3, was performed. The chromosomal analysis was also correlated with histologic evaluation for melanoma cell type (spindle vs epithelioid cell), ciliary body involvement, presence of positive periodic acid–Schiff vascular mimicry patterns, scleral or extrascleral spread and size. One case was excluded because of necrosis. Results.—Ten of the 17 remaining cases (59%) demonstrated monosomy 3 (in either the base or both base and apex of the tumor) with 7 cases (41%) showing disomy. Seven cases (70%) with monosomy 3 demonstrated this in both the apex and the base locations, whereas 3 cases (30%) showed monosomy in one location only (always at the base). Fourteen of the 17 cases (82%) revealed concordance in chromosome 3–monosomy 3 (7 of 14, 50%) or chromosome 3–disomy 3 (7 of 14, 50%). All 3 discordant cases demonstrated the monosomy 3 at the base with disomy at the apex. Lack of concordance between the base and apex did not correlate with melanoma cell type. Conclusions.—Prognostic variables are important in management of neoplasms, and this study points out that the site of tissue biopsy for prognostication in uveal melanoma could affect the results obtained, at least for the presence of monosomy 3.


2009 ◽  
Vol 133 (8) ◽  
pp. 1223-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun D. Singh ◽  
Raymond Tubbs ◽  
Charles Biscotti ◽  
Lynn Schoenfield ◽  
Pierre Trizzoi

Abstract Context.—Several studies have evaluated clinical, histopathologic, cytogenetic, and molecular prognostic variables in uveal melanoma. However, it is not known whether the primary tumor cells maintain these aggressive attributes at the metastatic sites. Objective.—To determine the status of chromosomes 3 and 8q and c-myc amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization on hepatic metastatic lesions of primary uveal melanoma. Design.—Ten patients with uveal melanoma with needle core biopsy–confirmed hepatic metastasis. Representative paraffin blocks were selected based on review of hematoxylin-eosin–stained sections. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed for detection of monosomy 3 and amplification at the 8q24 MYC locus using standard methods. The tricolor chromosome enumeration probe 8 (CEP8)/ IGH/MYC and the Urovysion probe consisting of CEP3, CEP7, CEP17, and 9P21 probes were used. A total of 200 interphase cells were scored. Results.—Hepatic metastasis was confirmed in each case by needle core biopsy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed chromosome 3 monosomy in 5 of the 8 cases that could be satisfactorily evaluated. Aneusomy of chromosome 8 was observed in 2 cases. MYC amplification was observed in 5 samples. In a single case where the primary tumor was treated by enucleation, the chromosomal monosomy 3 and aneusomy of chromosome 8 were present both in the primary tumor and its hepatic metastatic lesion. Conclusions.—The presence of cytogenetic changes within the metastatic lesions confirms that chromosome 3 monosomy and aneusomy of chromosome 8 are not just markers of metastatic potential of the primary tumor but are also present within the hepatic metastatic lesions.


2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1396-1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedram Pouryazdanparast ◽  
Marissa Newman ◽  
Mariam Mafee ◽  
Zahra Haghighat ◽  
Joan Guitart ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 554-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Sisley ◽  
Nicola Tattersall ◽  
Michael Dyson ◽  
Kath Smith ◽  
Hardeep S. Mudhar ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 695-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly Campa ◽  
Mahir Patel ◽  
Pamela Aubert ◽  
Gregory Hosler ◽  
Daniel Witheiler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document