Risk of New Primary Cancer in Patients with Posterior Uveal Melanoma: A National Cohort Study

Background: Studies on the risk of new primary cancer in patients with posterior uveal melanoma (UM) have produced conflicting results, and the role of socioeconomic status (SES) is unknown. The purpose of this population-based matched cohort study was to determine the risk of new primary cancer following the diagnosis of posterior UM. Methods: 2179 patients with posterior UM 1968–2016 and 22,717 matched controls without cancer were included. Incidence and time-dependent hazard ratio (HR) of new primary cancer were described, and the effect of SES was emphasized in a sub-cohort. Results: The incidence of new primary cancer was increased in patients with posterior UM, rate ratio (RR) 1.21 (95% CI: 1.08; 1.35), but the specific cancer types did not differ compared to the controls. The rate of new primary cancer following the diagnosis of posterior UM was significantly increased 2–5 years (HR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.23; 1.80)) and 11–15 years (HR: 1.49 (95% CI: 1.12; 1.99)), and adjusting for SES did not change the rate (HR 1.35 (95% CI:1.20; 1.55)). Conclusions: Patients with posterior UM have an increased risk of new primary cancer independent of SES. No difference in incidence of specific cancer type was observed compared to the control group.

Identification of a Prognostic Six-Immune-Gene Signature and a Nomogram Model for Uveal Melanoma

Background: To identify an immune-related prognostic signature and find potential therapeutic targets for uveal melanoma. Methods: The RNA-sequencing data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. The prognostic six-immune-gene signature was constructed through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multi-variate Cox regression analyses. Functional enrichment analysis and single sample GSEA were carried out. In addition, a nomogram model established by integrating clinical variables and this signature risk score was also constructed and evaluated.Results: We obtained 130 prognostic immune genes, and six of them were selected to construct a prognostic signature in the TCGA uveal melanoma dataset. Patients were classified into high-risk and low-risk groups according to a median risk score of this signature. High-risk group patients had poorer overall survival in comparison to the patients in the low-risk group (p < 0.001). These findings were further validated in two external GEO datasets. A nomogram model proved to be a good classifier for uveal melanoma by combining this signature. Both functional enrichment analysis and single sample GSEA analysis verified that this signature was truly correlated with immune system. In addition, in vitro cell experiments results demonstrated the consistent trend of our computational findings.Conclusion: Our newly identified six-immune-gene signature and a nomogram model could be used as meaningful prognostic biomarkers, which might provide uveal melanoma patients with individualized clinical prognosis prediction and potential novel treatment targets.

Usefulness of Liquid Biopsy for Intraocular Malignancies

Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in children, whereas Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignancy in adults [1,2]. Tissue biopsy is the standard gold technique for diagnosing the malignant neoplasm but an incisional tissue biopsy or fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is contraindicated for the intraocular malignancy [3]. Clinical diagnosis and imaging study are the only way to diagnose the intraocular malignancy due to the risk and fear of extraocular spread [4]. Recently, liquid biopsy has gained in popularity in the ophthalmic field. Liquid biopsy allows retinoblastoma diagnosis and a better understanding of the metastatic spread of uveal melanoma. Recently, the USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the make use of liquid biopsy (LB) as an appropriate diagnosis, prognosis, and also for monitoring tool in non-small cell lung carcinoma to keep away from invasive tissue biopsy in designated cases [5-7]. Liquid biopsy (LB) utilizes biofluid to evaluate for tumor-derived cells or cell-free DNA. LB is a relatively non-invasive technique rather than a tissue biopsy. In LB, material collected from multiple body fluids such as aqueous humor (AH), blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and saliva for molecular diagnosis [8] and detecting of cancer biomarkers such as circulating tumor cells (CTC), tumor derived cell free DNA (ct-DNA), circulating tumor RNA (ct-RNA), microRNA (miRNA), tumorrelated exosomes (TREs), and extracellular vescicles (EVs) [7]. Aqueous humor samples for RB (Ocular LB) and Venous blood samples for UM (systemic LB) are utilizing for analyzing the molecular characteristics [8]. In others ophthalmic malignancies like conjunctival melanoma or squamous cell carcinoma, the role of LB is still not studied because tissue biopsy is routinely done for confirming the diagnosis and also for mutational status [9-11].

Long-Term Outcomes in Uveal Melanoma After Ruthenium-106 Brachytherapy

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy. The aim of this retrospective study was to report the results after ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma in terms of tumor control, visual acuity, radiation-related complications, tumor recurrence, metastases, and patients’ survival rate during 4 years’ follow-up. A total of 355 eyes from 355 patients have been treated with Ru-106 plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma between February 2011 and March 2020. Five patients were lost to follow-up, and then 350 eyes of 350 patients (mean age 58 ± 11 years) were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmic examination including echography and spectral domain–optical coherence tomography. The mean follow-up was 4 years (3 months to 9 years). After treatment, the mean tumor thickness was reduced to 1.75 ± 0.21 mm. Radiation complications were found in 63% of patients: 38% showed radiation maculopathy, 11% had optic neuropathy, and 14% developed cataracts. Cancer-free survival was 99%, 97%, and 85%, respectively, at 5, 7, and 9 years. Ru-106 plaque brachytherapy represents a reliable treatment of uveal melanoma. This technique is valid and safe with a low rate of ocular complications during a long-term follow-up.